Re: Re: LibxmlJ formalities
Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Julian" == Julian Scheid <[email protected]> writes: Julian> But LibxmlJ works fine for Gjdoc, it's fast as hell compared Julian> to Xalan, and AFAICT it's the only way to wrap the latest Julian> JAXP-only Gjdoc into an executable, because Xalan doesn't play Julian> nicely with gcj. There's a version of Xalan in rhug (so it must be compilable with gcj). I don't follow this stuff too closely. Is that an older version or something? Julian> On the bright side, and not surprisingly, gcj-compiled Java using Julian> libxml/libxslt for XML processing is RAT fast and seems to exhibit Julian> a low memory footprint compared to Xalan or other pure-Java Julian> solutions. Sounds nice. Tom