Re: Re: LibxmlJ formalities
Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Nic" == Nic Ferrier <[email protected]> writes: Julian> Funny, it really turned out the exact opposite for Julian> me. Hmm. Well, gcj's compile-time behaviour is not very Julian> predictable, but at least the run-time behaviour of the stuff Julian> produced by it is... Nic> Tom, is this true? I've been told in the not too distant past that Nic> compiling from source was more reliable than from bytecode (by Per I Nic> think). Compiling from source gives better performance. However, the source front end has bugs (it is worse in some areas, like member classes). The bytecode front end is less buggy, but since it still doesn't do "function-as-a-tree" compilation, there are missed optimization opportunities. Tom