Re: What about creating javax.sql.*
Arnaud Vandyck <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:06:52 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.discuss,gmane.comp.java.classpath.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | STE-Formations Informatiques, ULg |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Maybe my mail wasn't clear enought but this is the response I expected: ___________________________________________________________ / Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> wrote: | Hi, | | On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 16:11, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: | > Can someone tell me if a free implementation already exists? Is | > the classpathx project interrested? | | The javax.sql, javax.transaction and javax.transaction.xa packages | are part of GNU Classpath <http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath> | and are, as far as I know, mostly implemented. That was what I was looking for! My problem is I want these implementations whithout the obligation of using the full classpath project. I wanted to package these for Debian[1]. And I don't know how to provide jta and jdbc-stdext-2.0 with free software. So! Is it possible to get jta and jdbc-stdext-2.0 separate from the full classpath so I can package these for Debian? Is it resonable as a transition (waiting full feature classpath api - awt and so...-)? | If you could check their status and maybe add some documentation | that would be very much appreciated. I can do that in one or two weeks. I check the full classpath cvs and the send patches if I am able to :-). | If you want the result to be part of the main distribution then | contributions should be based on publicly available documentation | and be original, so no copying allowed if you want the result be | part of the main distribution. Please contact the [email protected] | mailinglist for more information. Crossposted... | As was suggested earlier it would be very nice if you could check | the implementation against free software packages that are already | using these packages. JOTM[2] seems to implement jta: Related specifications[3] * Sun: Java Transaction API (JTA) Specification, * Sun: Java Transaction Service (JTS) Specification, * OMG: Transaction Service, * OASIS: Business Transaction Protocol. commons-dbcp[4] implements javax.sql.DataSource. I think many other projects must do this. Not only drivers. So, IMHO, it's not so important to have a implementation of the reference API but it's important to provide the reference API (I don't know if I am clear?). [1] see http://bugs.debian.org/188158 and http://bugs.debian.org/188196 [2] http://www.objectweb.org/jotm/ [3] http://www.objectweb.org/jotm/doc/ [4] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp/ - -- Arnaud Vandyck @ work FingerPrint = 82F3 45D0 F1B2 D79E D0BE 5188 E2FC C566 EEB6 B4C2 ,---- ----. | Linux Copy Party le 26 avril 2003 au Val Benoît | | http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/lcp/ | `---- ----' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+lXpz4vzFZu62tMIRApAIAJ94NQW4m9YLUlyY05hVt8hRCKdvdQCggVdW TTGxIevvcTQy6fJWVPDbYrc= =z5ry -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----