Re: Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?
Dalibor Topic <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Apr 2003 07:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Nic Ferrier <[email protected]> wrote: > Dalibor Topic <[email protected]> writes: > > > Salut Arnaud, > > > > --- Arnaud Vandyck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nic Ferrier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > GNUJAXP is under development, I am working on the build system and > > > > when I've done that I'll be working on bugs and missing features. > > > > > > Why don't you base the build system on jakarta-ant? Apache License is > > > also free software, isn't it? > > > > Kind of, but GPL incompatible according to the FSF. > > > > And I don't know if any free VM can really run latest/any Ant releases all > that > > well (kaffe can with a bit of prodding). I've had a long, boring discussion > on > > that topic (and how far GPL applies accross interpreter boundaries, the > annual > > mild licensing flamewar) with a debian developer archived here > > http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2002-August/027705.html . In short, if > you > > use Ant, you automatically kick yourself out of debian-free as long as no > other > > VM can 'legally'[1] run ant. > > If we really cared we would get ANT builds up and running on free VMs. > > But none of the contributing hackers really likes ANT much. It's no > suprise, make is a GNU tool. Why should we have to download ANT. > > > I would have no problem including an ANT build in GNUJAXP if someone > wants to make one. But I don't have the time. Yep. And since kaffe doesn't use ant for the class library build, there is no incentive for me as a GNUJAXP integrator to provide one. GNU Automake seems to be getting better and better at Java support. I'm looking forward to JAR support. cheers, dalibor topic __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com