Re: CVS tag structure - question - new tags proposed
Chris Burdess <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:51:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.javamail |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Conrad T. Pino wrote: > What is the rationale behind the inverted tag structure? There isn't one really. We don't do development on the branches so the tags are just there as markers to retrieve a given release. > Since CVS tags are cheap I propose leaving existing CVS tags > undisturbed and adding these: > > release-1-0-0 (revision tag for 1.0 release) > > release-1-1 (branch tag for 1.1 release series) > release-1-1-1 (revision tag for 1.1.1 release) > release-1-1-2 (revision tag for 1.1.2 release) Sounds fine. -- Chris Burdess