Re: Aelfred2 and JDK1.1 compatibility

Chris Burdess <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.xml
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Maarten Coene wrote:
> I was browsing through the sources of SAXDriver and XmlParser, and I 
> noticed a comment in the import statements claiming JDK 1.1 
> compatibility:
>
> SAXDriver.java:
> [...]
> // maintaining 1.1 compatibility for now ... more portable, PJava, etc
> // Iterator, Hashmap and ArrayList ought to be faster
> import java.util.ArrayList;
> import java.util.Collections;
> import java.util.Enumeration;
> import java.util.Hashtable;
> import java.util.Iterator;
> import java.util.List;
> import java.util.Vector;
> [...]
>
> However, some of these imports are not 1.1 compatible ... should the 
> comment be removed, or should the code be refactored to keep 1.1 
> compatibility?

JDK1.1 compatibility is not a target, unlike Classpath/libgcj 
compatibility.

We should be reevaluating this code to use more performant collection 
classes.
- -- 
Chris Burdess
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBFj0t6dl1DEqHgrgRAtyBAJ0eBJnJkhZbzV7lazN2mep3QrzNmwCeJNND
hhcqowKT4sWtiiG9p6Bvc8A=
=QIoZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.