(Fwd) Re: [gnu.org #213276] Licence compatibility for James Cl

This response from the licencing team didn't get through the mailing 
list filter. Just for information.


------- Forwarded message follows -------
Subject:        	Re: [gnu.org #213276] Licence compatibility for James Clark's XT
From:           	"[email protected] via RT" <[email protected]>
Send reply to:  	[email protected]
To:             	[email protected]
Copies to:      	[email protected]
Date sent:      	Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:45:51 -0400

This is a Free Software license, compatible with the GPL.

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 12:19, [email protected] via RT wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm working on a project that may need a Java XSL processor some way
> down the line. We intend to release the project under GPL and I'm
> doing research on what's available to work with.
> 
> I have been in touch with the GNU ClasspathX mailing list and it was
> suggested I ask you about the status of James Clark's XT, now
> maintained by Bill Lindsey.
> 
> http://www.blnz.com/xt/xt-20020426a-src/index.html
> 
> See the two links near the top of the page.
> 
> To me, the permission seems open and free, but I would appreciate a
> more authoritative opinion.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Phil
-- 
-Dave Turner
GPL Compliance Engineer
Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF




------- End of forwarded message -------