Re: GNU JAXP license violation

Nic Ferrier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.xml
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Elliotte Harold <[email protected]> writes:

> dom4j appears to be in violation of the GNUJAXP License unless it has 
> special permission from the FSF. Does it?
> 
> Specifically the latest release of dom4j (and probably earlier releases) 
> has taken the code from GNU JAXP, *modified it*, and incorporated it 
> into its code base which is published under a BSD license. They are not 
> merely linking to the GPL code as permitted by the GPL with library 
> exception.
> 
> The modifications are probably not major. The only one I know of is 
> changing the package name to org.dom4j.aelfred and org.dom4j.aelfred2 
> instead of gnu.jaxp.aelfred/gnu.jaxp.aelfred2 though there may be 
> others. I suspect the problem might be able to be cured by linking to 
> the unmodified gnujaxp.jar instead of incorporating the Gnu code 
> directly in the dom4j code base.

The exception licence should allow linking like that.

Dog? Let me know if you want any help with this.


-- 
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.