Re: GNU JAXP license violation

Maarten Coene <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.xml
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I asked this some time ago and their was no problem as long as the 
license file was included with dom4j. However, I can't find the start of 
the thread on the mailinglist:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpathx-discuss/2004-03/msg00006.html

If their is a problem with it, I'll remove the sources from dom4j ...

Maarten

Chris Burdess wrote:

> Elliotte Harold wrote:
>
>> dom4j appears to be in violation of the GNUJAXP License unless it has 
>> special permission from the FSF. Does it?
>
>
> I'm not aware of any such permission.
>
>> Specifically the latest release of dom4j (and probably earlier 
>> releases) has taken the code from GNU JAXP, *modified it*, and 
>> incorporated it into its code base which is published under a BSD 
>> license. They are not merely linking to the GPL code as permitted by 
>> the GPL with library exception.
>>
>> The modifications are probably not major. The only one I know of is 
>> changing the package name to org.dom4j.aelfred and org.dom4j.aelfred2 
>> instead of gnu.jaxp.aelfred/gnu.jaxp.aelfred2 though there may be 
>> others. I suspect the problem might be able to be cured by linking to 
>> the unmodified gnujaxp.jar instead of incorporating the Gnu code 
>> directly in the dom4j code base.
>
>
> That's correct. dom4j developers: would this be acceptable to you?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.