Re: GNU JAXP license violation
Maarten Coene <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I asked this some time ago and their was no problem as long as the license file was included with dom4j. However, I can't find the start of the thread on the mailinglist: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpathx-discuss/2004-03/msg00006.html If their is a problem with it, I'll remove the sources from dom4j ... Maarten Chris Burdess wrote: > Elliotte Harold wrote: > >> dom4j appears to be in violation of the GNUJAXP License unless it has >> special permission from the FSF. Does it? > > > I'm not aware of any such permission. > >> Specifically the latest release of dom4j (and probably earlier >> releases) has taken the code from GNU JAXP, *modified it*, and >> incorporated it into its code base which is published under a BSD >> license. They are not merely linking to the GPL code as permitted by >> the GPL with library exception. >> >> The modifications are probably not major. The only one I know of is >> changing the package name to org.dom4j.aelfred and org.dom4j.aelfred2 >> instead of gnu.jaxp.aelfred/gnu.jaxp.aelfred2 though there may be >> others. I suspect the problem might be able to be cured by linking to >> the unmodified gnujaxp.jar instead of incorporating the Gnu code >> directly in the dom4j code base. > > > That's correct. dom4j developers: would this be acceptable to you?