Re: Proof of concept GitHub repo

+0

/Hack

On 2012-04-05, at 12:38, Jeffrey Fredrick wrote:

> +1 for switching.
> 
> Jtf
> 
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paul Julius <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Julian Simpson <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> > I don't think anybody has publicly disagreed with that.  The sticking point
> > is that we haven't committed in 8 months.  I'm all for declaring bankruptcy
> > on SVN commits.
> 
> 
> I am on board with switching. I would really like to get a +1 from all
> current committers and JTF.
> 
> - PJ
> 
> 
> -- 
> CITCON
> Continuous Integration and Testing Conference
> http://www.citconf.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev_______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrol-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cruisecontrol-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrol-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cruisecontrol-devel