Re: Has the opensource version of CC been leftto die on the vine?

> We have a set of changes that could move CC forward a bit...
>

I'm be interested in them.

Jtf


On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:37 AM, EJ Ciramella <[email protected]>wrote:

>  And I should also say that over the years, I've always been a very loud
> advocate for CC (including convincing companies to discard CI servers that
> weren't working for them that they paid for).
>
> I've just grown tired of the inflexible UI (and the dashboard is useless).
>
> We have a set of changes that could move CC forward a bit, but it's still
> pretty far behind from what is offered freely.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Jeffrey Fredrick [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 13, 2009 12:53 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Cruisecontrol-user] Has the opensource version of CC been
> leftto die on the vine?
>
>
> Hi EJ,
>
> My view is no, CC has not been left to die on the vine but no there will be
> no trickle down from Cruise to CC.
>
> CruiseControl has historically been developed through community
> contributions not as part of an official Thoughtworks effort. The only
> recent exception to this was the Dashboard which they developed when they
> were working on "CruiseControl Enterprise". But when they changed directions
> and developed Cruise that was left to the community.
>
> As for why CC doesn't feature things that other CI servers offer, there's a
> long story and short one. The short one is that is mostly a matter of what
> has been submitted to the project.
>
> As a project we're still actively taking contributions and are happy to get
> new additions to the project.  Recently I haven't had a lot of time to work
> on the project — I do spend time every day moderating the mailing list — but
> I hope to have more time to spend in the near future.
>
> Jtf
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, EJ Ciramella <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  I'm leading an initiative to do away with CC here for a few reasons and
>> as part of this process, I've been tasked with reviewing any/all open
>> source/closed source CI servers.
>>
>> But I'm quite nostalgic - why doesn't the free version of CC feature some
>> of the things other free CI servers offer?
>>
>> Where's the trickle down effect from "Cruise" to "CC"?
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>>
>
> --
> Build engineer training: http://ci-guys.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
> royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrol-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cruisecontrol-user
>
>


-- 
Build engineer training: http://ci-guys.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects

_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrol-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cruisecontrol-user