Re: New FormType
Jeremy L Rosenberger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Unfortunately, even though java.sql.Date has a (more or less) analogue called java.util.Date, there's no corresponding analogue for java.sql.Timestamp. And it's too useful to ignore: As it is, I use java.sql.Timestamp in value objects because it's too much trouble to use anything else. (Whether this is a good idea is perhaps another story. :-) Cheers, Jeremy On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 18:05, Jacob Kjome wrote: > Hmm... I'm not sure about this? Why should the FormType class have > anything to do with SQL? It assumes the storage device; a relational > database. FormType should not be doing this. It should be storage > device agnostic and deal with general java objects/datatypes. > > Does anyone feel the same way, or am I just being pedantic? -- Jeremy L. Rosenberger * [email protected] http://www.frii.com/~jeremy/