RE: testcases and release stuff...

Nuked!

Any comments on the test failures?  Any solutions?  Should we ignore 
them?  Seems to defeat the purpose of the testcases if we do ignore them.


Jake

At 11:16 AM 5/16/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Jake,
>
>Yeah, I don't know why TestExample2 is there. I think it may have been 
>something I originally created way way way back to make sure that JUnit 
>invoked from Ant would run multiple tests. I see no reason to keep it. 
>Nuke away.
>
>Christian
>
>----------------------------------------------
>Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
>Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
>Barracuda - <http://barracudamvc.org/>http://barracudamvc.org
>----------------------------------------------
>"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] 
>[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
>Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 11:09 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [Barracuda] testcases and release stuff...
>
>
>Why are there two TestExample classes that are, essentially, identical but 
>one is called "TestExample.java" in the o.e.b package and the other is 
>called TestExample2.java in the o.e.b.core package???  I would think that 
>the latter could be removed.   Is that ok?
>
>I made some commits to cure some build problems with the testcases.  This 
>was reported by Stefan Armbruster.  Thanks for that :-)
>
>We still have a problems with the 
>org.enhydra.barracuda.core.forms.validators.TestDateRangeValidator and the 
>org.enhydra.barracuda.core.forms.validators.TestDateValidator with 268 
>failures in the former and 4 failures in the latter.  If any of you forms 
>experts can look into this today, that would be great!
>
>We are getting very close to release.so please speak up if you see 
>problems in the latest CVS of Barracuda.  Also, if you think certain parts 
>of the docs need to be changed before release, make sure you ping the list 
>about this.  Again, patches are very welcome.
>
>
>Jake