RE: testcases and release stuff...

I know we've had some of these errors for a while, and maybe my memory is 
failing me, but I don't think we had 268 failures in 
TestDateRangeValidator.  I know we had some, but not that many.  The 4 
errors in TestDateValidator all seem to be clearly related to Locale 
issues.  However, I'm not sure about the ones in TestDateRangeValidator?

Have you actually looked at the failure messages recently?

Jake

At 12:14 PM 5/16/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Well...we probably shouldn't ignore them (because they are in fact 
>errors), but we have in fact been ignoring them for quite some 
>time...these particular errors all seem to stem from a locale issue...I 
>remember when Robert Leftwich wrote the tests, they worked on his box (in 
>Australia), but they had problems here.
>
>So in answer to your question, they probably should be fixed, but its not 
>going to kill us if they aren't fixed immediately (they've been this way 
>for over a year at least). So unless anyone has some spare cycles to look 
>at the problem (and I'd guess it'd only take an hour or two to find/fix), 
>I'd say we shouldn't worry about that holding up a new release.
>
>My .02...
>
>Christian
>
>
>----------------------------------------------
>Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
>Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
>Barracuda - <http://barracudamvc.org/>http://barracudamvc.org
>----------------------------------------------
>"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] 
>[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
>Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 11:51 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Barracuda] testcases and release stuff...
>
>
>Nuked!
>
>Any comments on the test failures?  Any solutions?  Should we ignore 
>them?  Seems to defeat the purpose of the testcases if we do ignore them.
>
>
>Jake
>
>At 11:16 AM 5/16/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>Hi Jake,
>>
>>Yeah, I don't know why TestExample2 is there. I think it may have been 
>>something I originally created way way way back to make sure that JUnit 
>>invoked from Ant would run multiple tests. I see no reason to keep it. 
>>Nuke away.
>>
>>Christian
>>
>>----------------------------------------------
>>Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
>>Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
>>Barracuda - <http://barracudamvc.org/>http://barracudamvc.org
>>----------------------------------------------
>>"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected] 
>>[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
>>Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 11:09 AM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: [Barracuda] testcases and release stuff...
>>
>>Why are there two TestExample classes that are, essentially, identical 
>>but one is called "TestExample.java" in the o.e.b package and the other 
>>is called TestExample2.java in the o.e.b.core package???  I would think 
>>that the latter could be removed.   Is that ok?
>>I made some commits to cure some build problems with the testcases.  This 
>>was reported by Stefan Armbruster.  Thanks for that :-)
>>We still have a problems with the 
>>org.enhydra.barracuda.core.forms.validators.TestDateRangeValidator and 
>>the org.enhydra.barracuda.core.forms.validators.TestDateValidator with 
>>268 failures in the former and 4 failures in the latter.  If any of you 
>>forms experts can look into this today, that would be great!
>>We are getting very close to release.so please speak up if you see 
>>problems in the latest CVS of Barracuda.  Also, if you think certain 
>>parts of the docs need to be changed before release, make sure you ping 
>>the list about this.  Again, patches are very welcome.
>>
>>Jake