Re: Re: Bug in BTable

Hi,

> Weren't you talking about formally creating something like what Stefan has
> described with his IterativeSubModel?  That is, something like a formal way
> to do Parent/Child models?  IterativeSubModel seems like it fits the
> bill.  Maybe we should get IterativeSubModel into the main comp package?

My planned child-model extension is complementary to Stefans - he provides the 
neccessary communication between the two models, and my (planned) extension 
takes care of automatically adding it when the outer model has a sub-model.

Diez