RE: Error: doSubmitAndLock is not defined

Jancsi,

Which browser are you using?  Can you use Mozilla and tell me what you see 
in the Javascript Console?  I suspect there might be another script error 
happening before this that causes doSubmitAndLock() not to be 
defined.  Besides this, you can set the component to use CUSTOM_SCRIPT 
which allows you to use your own scripting rather than Barracuda's 
scripting.  To do this, do this to your 
component:  comp.setRenderStrategy(RenderStrategy.CUSTOM_SCRIPT).  That 
said, there is no reason this should be necessary as the default way should 
work.

As Christian requested before, can you provide the resulting HTML sent to 
your browser?  Oh, and does your page actually finish loading?  It could be 
that the FormControl.js script isn't actually getting downloaded from the 
server.  It is sent by the ResourceGateway servlet which might be having 
trouble delivering the requested script.  I don't know why this would 
happen and have never seen it fail, but it is a possibility.

Jake

At 04:06 PM 9/4/2003 +0300, you wrote:
>Acutally i don't think is related to your changes, as we did not update
>the barracuda version, we are working with barracuda 1.2.0.
>
>The code used is something like this (returned from model):
>
>BAction b = new BAction();
>b.setAction(new GetBaseModelComponents());
>Integer p1 = null;
>Integer p2 = null;
>if(gForm!=null)
>{
>   p1 = gForm.getIntegerVal(GForm.P1);
>   p2 = gForm.getIntegerVal(GForm.P2);
>}
>// set params
>b.setParam(GForm.P1, p1==null ? "" : p1.toString());
>b.setParam(GForm.P1, p2==null ? "" : p2.toString());
>b.setAttr("value","A value);
>return b;
>
>Just checked the code, seems like the script is added because weare
>returning a BAction. (in all other cases we set return only the string
>value, wich is replaced with the value).
>
>For the moment I took the scripts and pasted them in the html file, and
>it seems to work, however this is an uggly fix for the problem.
>
>Anyway, I'm just wondering if:
>- this script behaviour can be disabled (as I don't need to disable the
>buttons after clicking, because it does not matter if they are disbled
>or not)
>- for using the scripts, should I add the refference to the
>FormControl.js file, or this should be added by the framework?
>
>         Jancsi
>
>
>On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:37, Christian Cryder wrote:
> > Hi Jansci!
> >
> > Hmmm...this is probably not a coincidence; I tweaked the behavior of 
> BScript
> > yesterday, which could be related to this. Can you give me some more
> > background info: What version of Barracuda are you using? (how recently 
> have
> > you pulled from cvs?) Where exactly are you seeing the error? Are you guys
> > using the default approach with components (allowing scripting)? Or are you
> > explicitly trying to turn it off? What does the code that creates the
> > component look like? And what does the final markup look like?
> >
> > doSubmitAndLock is a Javascript call that Barracuda uses when submitting
> > from a button; the call gets embedded in the markup, but when it's 
> used, its
> > supposed to actually include a FormControl.js reference in the page (so 
> that
> > the function can be resolved)...
> >
> > Christian
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > Christian Cryder
> > Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
> > Project Chair, BarracudaMVC - http://barracudamvc.org
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jancsi A.
> > > Farkas(fx)
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:07 AM
> > > To: barracuda
> > > Subject: [Barracuda] Error: doSubmitAndLock is not defined
> > >
> > >
> > > I have a strange javascriopt error: Error: doSubmitAndLock is not
> > > defined
> > >
> > > Until yesterday everything seemed to work ok, but maybe some of our
> > > developers added some code to a button, and for now this error pops up.
> > > How can I get rid of this error?
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > >     Jancsi
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 22:50, Christian Cryder wrote:
> > > > Hi Robert,
> > > >
> > > > Someone asked a similar question on the Struts mailing list a
> > > while back,
> > > > and so I'm attaching my response to them there. Perhaps this
> > > will at least
> > > > start to point you in the direction of some answers...
> > > >
> > > > Christian
> > > > ------------------------
> > > > Well, I was on the JSR 127 group for a while, and I certainly know
> > > > Barracuda, so I'll take a stab at answering your question.
> > > >
> > > > My initial reaction when I first read the JSR (almost 2 years ago?) was
> > > > "wow...this sounds just like Barracuda". Then as I got more involved it
> > > > seemed to me that they were taking things a significantly different
> > > > direction (much to my disappointment).
> > > >
> > > > Now, if anyone is interested there's a copy of a Barracuda vs.
> > > Struts vs.
> > > > JSR-127 review (available here:
> > > >
> > > http://atmreports.com/downloads/barracuda_vs_struts_vs_jsr127.zip) that I
> > > > completed shortly after attending the first JSR meeting. As you
> > > read, please
> > > > keep in mind that:
> > > >
> > > > a) these comments are based on what JSR-127 looked like nearly 2 years
> > > > ago...there's undoubtedly been a huge amount of changes,
> > > refinements, etc,
> > > > and my recollection is probably fuzzy in many areas.
> > > >
> > > > b) these comments are solely my opinions, and are probably wrong in 
> many
> > > > respects; the purpose of this review was NOT to dis either Struts or
> > > > JSR-127, but rather to try and understand how it relates to
> > > Barracuda. So if
> > > > anything, its probably more insight into my view of the domain
> > > than anyone
> > > > elses.
> > > >
> > > > Nevertheless, perhaps it will still be helpful...
> > > >
> > > > My general "gut reactions" to JSR-127 are that its too tied to
> > > JSP for my
> > > > taste (I understand why Sun made this decision, but I think it
> > > will make it
> > > > very difficult for them to succeed in the long run). In theory
> > > JSF is not
> > > > bound to any specific rendering approach, but last time I
> > > checked the only
> > > > implementation being supported was via JSPs, so I think I'd agree with
> > > > Dudley's comments...to me, JSF looks like a souped up version
> > > of Struts. It
> > > > seems like its taking an awful long time to deliver anything.
> > > Its not going
> > > > to be open source when its finally released either (has this
> > > changed?). In
> > > > short, I think most of the "problems" I see with Struts still
> > > apply to JSF,
> > > > and I'm not at all sure why someone who is already using Struts
> > > would go to
> > > > the effort of migrating to JSF (but I'm sure there are folks
> > > here who could
> > > > comment on that). Consequently, I don't really see it as competing with
> > > > Barracuda because I think that even though they are using
> > > similar verbiage,
> > > > the architectures really are fundamentally different.
> > > >
> > > > At any rate...those are my haphazard thoughts (worth precisely
> > > what you paid
> > > > for them). Comments and feedback welcome...
> > > >
> > > > Christian
> > > > ----------------------------------------------
> > > > Christian Cryder
> > > > Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
> > > > Project Chair, BarracudaMVC - http://barracudamvc.org
> > > > ----------------------------------------------
> > > > "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Robert J.P. 
> Yang
> > > > > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:48 PM
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: [Barracuda] JavaServiceFace vs BarracudaMVC
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sun's JFS final release will be done!
> > > > > How about JFS vs BarracudaMVC?
> > > > > And,especially,what's barracudamvc longterm planning?
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Barracuda mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Barracuda mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Barracuda mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Barracuda mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Barracuda mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda