Re: Competition
Stephen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi All, Our requirement is for database driven sites that are being used on the web. We recently had a look at Millstone and Echo and felt they were more suited to corporate applications where the web graphics and "look and feel" is rarely changed. Not to say that Millstone and Echo would be better than Barracuda for corporate development, however, for us, the choice was simple. Barracuda gives us a clean separation of site development and application development. Cheers Stephen Jacob Kjome wrote: > Without having looked extensively at this stuff, it seems that both of > the mentioned frameworks remove one of the most compelling features of > Barracuda; use of actual markup + styling + scripting to generate > layout. All examples I saw seemed to go overboard in doing everything > in the servlet. This forces the Java programmer to be intimately > involved in the role of the designer. While the code seems pretty > elegant, there is no way that I'd choose to develop a web site as if I > was creating a Swing GUI. Would designer mockups need to be manually > translated by the coder into framework-specific components? There's > probably stuff that I'm missing, but I'm not sure if these frameworks > compete directly with Barracuda? Thoughts? > > Jake > > At 03:57 PM 9/11/2003 +0100, you wrote: > >> Hi Denny (and all), >> >> Thursday, September 11, 2003, 3:04:59 PM, you wrote: >> >> DC> Here is an IBM article on the Echo Web framework. >> DC> http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-echo1/ >> >> There's another framework called Millstone >> (http://www.millstone.org), along similar lines as Echo that you >> might also want to consider if comparing with Barracuda. >> >> [ My position on this is that I recently had to knock up a quick >> web-app to do some XmlRpc testing - basically display a few tables >> of values, let the user change some, kick off the request then >> display the result. >> >> At the same time, while I've been lurking here for a while, I didn't >> have any Barracuda experience or framework to hand to jump-start me >> towards Barracuda, so I had a quick look at both of the above & went >> for Millstone. Mainly as it would let me update the client after a >> server-side event, but that's probably not a normal issue - The >> other thing was that it looked to have an easier way of editing >> tables than Echo did... >> >> I don't have a publicly available demo, but if anyone does want to >> take a look at Millstone, I could email them some of the code I >> used. ] >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Gwyn mailto:[email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Barracuda mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda > > > _______________________________________________ > Barracuda mailing list > [email protected] > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda