RE: dom loading in Barracuda - proposed change
Thelmo Loisio <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 20:19, Jacob Kjome wrote: > Now, it is arguable that we might want to have these methods in all > DOMLoader implementations which, actually, would allow for continued > support of <dom-loader> and <dom-loader-register> in the > DefaultApplicationAssembler since it counts on all DOMLoader's to have > these methods. The question is, are these methods really just > implementation details or are they important enough that all > implementations should support them? I'm teetering on this question right > now and wouldn't have too much of a problem if you said that you'd like to > force implementation of these methods in all DOMLoader > implementations. Any further thoughts? Well forcing DOMLoader's to have these methods letting the implementation choose to 'do nothing' seems a good choice left for the implementation developer which is always a good one for my point of view. -- Thelmo