RE: Barracuda and DODS (again)

"Paul Heath" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general
Message-ID <007401c3b784$53d09310$ca01a8c0@ntwd>
We have been using Torque (http://db.apache.org/torque/) for several
years as the persistence layer in our Barracuda apps.

Our biggest database has 200+ tables - works like a charm - performance
is good.

If you use with MS SQL Server database you will need a commercial JDBC
driver. The free JDBC driver from MS is not suitable for a production
environment.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Diez B. Roggisch
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 2:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Barracuda] Barracuda and DODS (again)

Hi,

> Yes, I will try, for I'm quite interested in using DODS or a similar
> tool for generating database management java code.
> I have found no answer to my question about how the pleople that work
> with Barracuda deal with databases.
> I there are no more comments I will think they make the code by
> themselves. Some hint? :)

Hibernate, CastorJDO, EJBs, JRF. I would recommend Hibernate if you
don't need 
the remote features of EJBs. JRF is somewhat outdated, and CastorJDO
isn't 
very actively supported.

Prevayler looks nice, but I see problems in cases where you want to move

between releases - issuing some DDL-scripts is certainly easier than
creating 
mappings between objects that change.

Regards,

Diez

_______________________________________________
Barracuda mailing list
[email protected]
http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.