Re: Re: Roadmap?
Srinivas Yermal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Diez, Thanks much! you answered most of my questions... I will definitely look into the contrib packages. But couple of my questions still remains. What is the roadmap of Barracuda? What next? Any plans on anything? You said - "like configurable bindings between events and classes - are available in core barracuda. " Could you please talk a lil more about what bindings exist other than application assembler? Thanks, Srini. Diez B. Roggisch wrote: >Hi, > > > >>I would really appreciate if the barracuda guys shed some light on my >>thoughts here. I would like to know whether I am way too off-track here. >> >> > >To answer your question: there is no such thing planned. >What you are talking about here is more something for (or like) an >application framework. Which could of course utilize the Barracuda mechanisms >to be implemented. Parts of it - like configurable bindings between events >and classes - are available in core barracuda. Others, like dynamic form >generation, are part of contrib packages - AFAIK stefan armbruster has done >such stuff. > >Did this answer your question? > >Diez > >_______________________________________________ >Barracuda mailing list >[email protected] >http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda > > >