Re: Re: Roadmap?

Srinivas Yermal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Diez,
Thanks much! you answered most of my questions... I will definitely look 
into the contrib packages.

But couple of my questions still remains. What is the roadmap of 
Barracuda? What next? Any plans on anything?
You said - "like configurable bindings between events and classes - are 
available in core barracuda. " Could you please talk a lil more about 
what bindings exist other than application assembler?

Thanks,
Srini.

Diez B. Roggisch wrote:

>Hi,
>
>  
>
>>I would really appreciate if the barracuda guys shed some light on my
>>thoughts here. I would like to know whether I am way too off-track here.
>>    
>>
>
>To answer your question: there is no such thing planned. 
>What you are talking about here is more something for (or like) an 
>application framework. Which could of course utilize the Barracuda mechanisms 
>to be implemented. Parts of it - like configurable bindings between events 
>and classes - are available in core barracuda. Others, like dynamic form 
>generation, are part of contrib packages - AFAIK stefan armbruster has done 
>such stuff.
>
>Did this answer your question?
>
>Diez
>
>_______________________________________________
>Barracuda mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
>
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.