Re: ObjectWeb Portal
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> Mon, 05 Jan 2004 23:28:23 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm of the opinion that we should move most infrastructure to ObjectWeb and host demos, wiki, blogs, and other things like that on our barracudamvc.org server. That makes it so we administer only the stuff we truly care about administering in our own way. Stuff like CVS, releases, nightly builds, bug tracking is all very necessary, but more tedious to administer. ObjectWeb gives us the ability to offload this into their capable hands, leaving us with more free time to concentrate on building, documenting, and having fun working with a great project such as Barracuda. Jake At 09:25 PM 1/5/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Hi folks, > >Another topic for discussion: Barracuda has been accepted as a project at >ObjectWeb. We need to decide exactly what that's going to look like. >Specifically, they'd like us to move everything to their project servers. >I'd prefer not to go quite this far, since: > >a) the community pitched in to buy our own machine, and I'd hate to just >abandon that >b) there really are advantages to having our own machine in terms of running >sample apps, etc - we can control the environment, and upgrade >libraries/software as needed, without having to worry about breaking someone >elses apps >c) the whole protection issue (this was more of a concern with Lutris than >OW, but the same prinicple still applies - if the sponsor goes away or gets >nasty, and you have your own server, its no big deal) > >So I've basically been thinking that we continue to run everything off of >http://barracudamvc.org, and just mirror the cvs source tree over at >ObjectWeb. Of course that means we have to figure out what's causing our box >to crash and fix it. And we also need to get mail archiving set up. And get >daily build working. etc. In short, we still have some work to do on the >Barracuda box, and we're particularly short on time right now. And as you >can see below, OW has quite a bit of infrastructure, plus people who support >it (so we don't have to). > >An alternate strategy might be to move a lot of the infrastructure stuff >_off_ of the Barracuda MVC box (like email, archiving, searching, etc), but >continue to host docs and sample apps on our own box. So the gist of all >this is I'm looking for input...what do you think of the ObjectWEb setup, >and what would you recommend for us to leverage? > >Shawn, Denny, Jake, and Diez in particular should chime in here... > >Christian >---------------------------------------------- >Christian Cryder >Internet Architect, ATMReports.com >Project Chair, BarracudaMVC - http://barracudamvc.org >---------------------------------------------- >"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" > >_______________________________________________ >Barracuda mailing list >[email protected] >http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda