RE: ObjectWeb Portal
"Christian Cryder" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:31:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Glad to hear people like this direction...I agree that it could definitely be beneficial. I am wondering if anyone has the inclination to become the "object web expert," in terms of figuring out how to get things set up there, migrate over, etc. Denny, you still lurking out there? I know you were managing the Barracuda portal on SourceForge for a while, and the OW interface is quite similar...is this something you'd like to do? If nobody steps forward, I can take it on, but my time is limited right now, so we might be able to move things along faster if somebody wants to take this task on... Christian ---------------------------------------------- Christian Cryder Internet Architect, ATMReports.com Project Chair, BarracudaMVC - http://barracudamvc.org ---------------------------------------------- "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Shawn Wilson > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Barracuda] ObjectWeb Portal > > > > I'm of the opinion that we should move most infrastructure to ObjectWeb > > and host demos, wiki, blogs, and other things like that on our > > barracudamvc.org server. That makes it so we administer only the stuff > > we truly care about administering in our own way. Stuff like CVS, > > releases, nightly builds, bug tracking is all very necessary, but more > > tedious to administer. ObjectWeb gives us the ability to offload this > > into their capable hands, leaving us with more free time to concentrate > > on building, documenting, and having fun working with a great project > > such as Barracuda. > > I agree with this... sounds like a great idea! > > -shawn > > Jacob Kjome wrote: > > I'm of the opinion that we should move most infrastructure to ObjectWeb > > and host demos, wiki, blogs, and other things like that on our > > barracudamvc.org server. That makes it so we administer only the stuff > > we truly care about administering in our own way. Stuff like CVS, > > releases, nightly builds, bug tracking is all very necessary, but more > > tedious to administer. ObjectWeb gives us the ability to offload this > > into their capable hands, leaving us with more free time to concentrate > > on building, documenting, and having fun working with a great project > > such as Barracuda. > > > > Jake > > > > At 09:25 PM 1/5/2004 -0500, you wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> Another topic for discussion: Barracuda has been accepted as a > project at > >> ObjectWeb. We need to decide exactly what that's going to look like. > >> Specifically, they'd like us to move everything to their > project servers. > >> I'd prefer not to go quite this far, since: > >> > >> a) the community pitched in to buy our own machine, and I'd > hate to just > >> abandon that > >> b) there really are advantages to having our own machine in terms of > >> running > >> sample apps, etc - we can control the environment, and upgrade > >> libraries/software as needed, without having to worry about breaking > >> someone > >> elses apps > >> c) the whole protection issue (this was more of a concern with Lutris > >> than > >> OW, but the same prinicple still applies - if the sponsor goes away or > >> gets > >> nasty, and you have your own server, its no big deal) > >> > >> So I've basically been thinking that we continue to run > everything off of > >> http://barracudamvc.org, and just mirror the cvs source tree over at > >> ObjectWeb. Of course that means we have to figure out what's causing > >> our box > >> to crash and fix it. And we also need to get mail archiving set up. > >> And get > >> daily build working. etc. In short, we still have some work to > do on the > >> Barracuda box, and we're particularly short on time right now. > And as you > >> can see below, OW has quite a bit of infrastructure, plus people who > >> support > >> it (so we don't have to). > >> > >> An alternate strategy might be to move a lot of the > infrastructure stuff > >> _off_ of the Barracuda MVC box (like email, archiving, searching, > >> etc), but > >> continue to host docs and sample apps on our own box. So the > gist of all > >> this is I'm looking for input...what do you think of the > ObjectWEb setup, > >> and what would you recommend for us to leverage? > >> > >> Shawn, Denny, Jake, and Diez in particular should chime in here... > >> > >> Christian > >> ---------------------------------------------- > >> Christian Cryder > >> Internet Architect, ATMReports.com > >> Project Chair, BarracudaMVC - http://barracudamvc.org > >> ---------------------------------------------- > >> "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Barracuda mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Barracuda mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda > > _______________________________________________ > Barracuda mailing list > [email protected] > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda