Re: AW: License proposal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> The only way to keep Barracuda truly free is by using the LGPL.  I think we
> have to have clear reasons of why not to use it if we are to actually
> choose a license other than LGPL.

I agree with this - there's a lot of LGPLed java stuff out there that isn't 
rendered useless by its license. I have no deeper insight into the 
motivations of the apache-group, but I can imagine that they like the idea of 
having the opportunity to turn something into a commercial product - so 
_they_ might have their troubles with LGPL.

So - as long as we don't want to be part of jakarta, I still opt for LGPL.

Diez
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/+9fOBUNnEs5xWG4RAmQzAJ9vGxIO2lZVy0JxD+52fskQOu28/ACfSpDx
YUwN9DAXbgQuvwFUsyHq6yk=
=qkPW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----