Re: AW: License proposal
Shawn Wilson <[email protected]> Wed, 07 Jan 2004 12:53:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> "What about the cases where Java code not only _imports_ an LGPL library, > but also writes code that _extends_ LGPL classes?" This latter case is a > common occurrence (by design) in Barracuda, as developers extend Abstract > base classes to implement event handlers. I think this is where LGPL is vague, since I (as well as others) are confused on this aspect. The last thing we want in a license is one that is vague. -shawn Christian Cryder wrote: > So here's the pertinent question (as I see it): > > "What about the cases where Java code not only _imports_ an LGPL library, > but also writes code that _extends_ LGPL classes?" This latter case is a > common occurrence (by design) in Barracuda, as developers extend Abstract > base classes to implement event handlers. > > I really want to believe that LGPL is fine and dandy here, but I also feel > its very important to make the right decision. > > Now, if we _can't_ use LGPL, then I think that throws our relationship with > ObjectWeb into question, as they require LGPL for membership. I've emailed > them asking for their take on this issue... > > Christian > ---------------------------------------------- > Christian Cryder > Internet Architect, ATMReports.com > Project Chair, BarracudaMVC - http://barracudamvc.org > ---------------------------------------------- > "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [email protected] >>[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Xue-Feng Yang >>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:06 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: RE: AW: [Barracuda] License proposal >> >> >> --- James Carnegie <[email protected]> wrote: > On >>Wed, 2004-01-07 at 13:12, Andrew Hill wrote: >> >>>It is only concerned with distribution of code - it >>>has nothing to do >>>with copyright. >>>With Barracuda's future in mind, and my company >>>which uses it, I >>>strongly recommend the LGPL! >>>There are as far as I am aware, no issues with it at >>>all! >> >>Are you sure a non open source commercial software can >>extend the classes in open source software with LGPL? >> >>______________________________________________________________________ >>Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca >>_______________________________________________ >>Barracuda mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda > > > _______________________________________________ > Barracuda mailing list > [email protected] > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda