RE: AW: License proposal
Barr Bill P <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:33:20 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D9116729BD51D711BE170004AC23D55B03B1325C@nct0010mb09.nc.no.irs.gov> |
With BSD, you basically have zero say in what happens to the code, downstream. -----Original Message----- From: Christian Cryder [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: AW: [Barracuda] License proposal Given this, are there any compelling reasons why we shouldn't go with BSD instead of LGPL? Anyone have any comments? Christian ---------------------------------------------- Christian Cryder Internet Architect, ATMReports.com Project Chair, BarracudaMVC - http://barracudamvc.org <http://barracudamvc.org/> ---------------------------------------------- "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Barr Bill P Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:06 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: AW: [Barracuda] License proposal So it looks like we _could_ choose BSD and still be hosted at ObjectWeb. The BSD basically says, "Do what you want, we don't care. We're also not liable. Just mention us in your derivative works."