Re: LGPL Findings
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:02:41 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 09:08 PM 1/14/2004 -0500, you wrote: >The bottom line then: LGPL seems perfectly fine (and probably best) for what >we want it to do - it allows for commercial applications to be built on top >of Barracuda without infecting them, and yet it requires changes to the >library to remain in the public domain. perfect! >SO...if anyone still has questions or comments, let's here them, but as for >me, I think I'm +1 on LGPL. Glad we have some consensus forming :-) >Special thanks to David Turner of the Free Software Foundation for taking >time to explain all this to me... Yes, definitely. It would be nice if they would publish something like this as an official FAQ on LGPL and Java. I think a lot of Apache people might eat their words on their ideas about the LGPL being "viral". Jake