Re: LGPL verbiage in cvs
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> Sun, 01 Feb 2004 01:21:00 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Christian (and all), I added jivan-1.0rc2.jar and made all updates necessary. I deleted the Barracuda_1_2_6 tag on jivan-1.0rc1.jar and moved them on the other files I added/updated which include jivan-1.0rc2.jar, version.properties, JivanDOMFactory.java (which I updated in a very minor way to take advantage of a new Jivan api method that I had suggested to Arno; to take an InputStream rather than force one to create an Apache InputSource and pass that in). BTW, you made Arno the copyright holder on JivanDOMFactory.java. It was actually me that wrote it so I changed it. If I shouldn't have done that, you can change it back. I'm not going to regenerate the jars. I'll leave that to you right before the release is made. Just make sure to move the tags on all jars you update. Should only need to be the core jar, at least for the change I made. They should all be compiled with the same VM. Might want to do it with the latest 1.3.1 VM to make sure the release is binary compatible with 1.3.1. I've seen issues where code compiled for 1.4.x has issues running under 1.3.1 but never the other way around. XMLC was compiled with JDK1.3.1_10. Oh, you should also probably copy barracuda jars into BarracudaDiscRack *after* the Barracuda release is made, just to make sure the actually 1.2.6 jars are in there. Then make that release. later, Jake At 11:35 PM 1/31/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Ok folks, we're just about ready to roll the new 1.2.6 release... >----------------- ><p><b>csc_013104_2</b> - Changed all the license verbiage to LGPL. Rebuilt >all the jars. Got BarracudaDiscRack upgraded to the latest version. Started >working on updating all the docs for the new 1.2.6 release. At this point, >we are very close to being ready to roll a build (still waiting for a new >Jivan binary licensed under LGPL). >----------------- > >Please note that I when I went through updating all the source files to use >the LGPL verbiage, I have attempted to correctly identify the copyright >holder (the original author) for all the files. In most cases this is me, >but there are obviously a number of classes that other people have written. >If you were the original author for a class, please check the tree to make >sure that I correctly acknowledge you as copyright holder...in the process >of doing massive search and replace, its possible I may have misidentified >the original owner. Note that wherever possible, I have tried to retain the >javadoc contributor comments, which identify all major contributors, not >just the original copyright owner. > >Should be ready sometime tomorrow to finish everything up... > >Christian >---------------------------------------------- >Christian Cryder >Internet Architect, ATMReports.com >Project Chair, BarracudaMVC - http://barracudamvc.org >---------------------------------------------- >"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" > >_______________________________________________ >Barracuda mailing list >[email protected] >http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda