Re: Fw: Question about GPL (semi off topic)
[email protected] Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:12:20 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 000122CF88257014_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Jacob wrote: I may be way off conceptually (this is really just a shot in the dark), but the idea is that this is not a question of interpretation of the GPL. It's a matter of which licence has been applied. Let me try to explain this with an exampl --------------------- It is a question of interpretation of the GPL. It is licensed under the GPL. That is explicit at their site. You an do anything you want under the terms of the GPL. If you don't want to abide by the GPL, they will give you a different option, a commercial license. How MySQL is interperting the GPL is suspect..... It is in their right to release it under a difference license (assuming that they own the copyright to ALL the code) that explicitly states that commerical ASPs needs to get a commercial license. But the GPL does not say that. Then again, you did say that it was a shot in the dark.. :-) Edward --=_alternative 000122CF88257014_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jacob wrote:</font> <br> <br><font size=2><tt>I may be way off conceptually (this is really just a shot in the dark), but the<br> idea is that this is not a question of interpretation of the GPL. It's a<br> matter of which licence has been applied. Let me try to explain this with an<br> exampl</tt></font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">---------------------</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">It is a question of interpretation of the GPL. It is licensed under the GPL. That is explicit at their site.</font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">You an do anything you want under the terms of the GPL.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If you don't want to abide by the GPL, they will give you a different option, a commercial license.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">How MySQL is interperting the GPL is suspect..... It is in their right to release it under a difference license </font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">(assuming that they own the copyright to ALL the code) that explicitly states that commerical ASPs needs </font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">to get a commercial license. But the GPL does not say that.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Then again, you did say that it was a shot in the dark.. :-)</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Edward</font> <br> <br> <br> --=_alternative 000122CF88257014_=--