Re: Project activity

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1124474585-15681-176
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/19/05, Onno Scheffers <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not really (last tried in T4Beta2)... only if you place all HTML-files
> into the context-root. That means you make your templates/prototype
> publicly accessible, while they shouldn't be in my opinion.
> I'd like to place them into the WEB-INF folder. Tapestry doesn't pick
> them up then unless you have the a .page file available there.

Not at all, please look at Tapestry related infos (doc, ml and source).
Not counting that the template are still public documents since
they're rendered in your web app.
=20
> Yes, you can make that attribute anything you'd like. But no matter what
> you name it, that ID will be removed while rendering the components.
> That means if you set the 'special attribute' to 'id', the id's will be
> stripped from the output. That could render your DHTML useless (since
> client side scripts may depend on those ID's as well).

They could as the could relay on name. It's a matter of choice.

This discussion is OT here so i will not reply anymore and sorry for the no=
ise.

For the records, I like barracuda too as I've used it for my biggest
app (an HTML to Z39.50 gateway with state-full to state-less protocol
binding) and it served me _very_ well but Tapestry seems to me a more
powerful framework, just to mention one feature, its support for
portlet development. So it is difficult to compare the two without
keeping in mind the broad target they share.


Ciao
--=20
Massimo


------------=_1124474585-15681-176
Content-Type: text/plain; name="message-footer.txt"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="message-footer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



--

Barracuda mailing list

[email protected]

http://www.objectweb.org/wws/lists/projects/barracuda


------------=_1124474585-15681-176--