RE: Barracuda: Barracuda vs. JTC?
"Christian Cryder" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Barracuda vs. JTC?Interesting. I actually downloaded it and took a quick look...not much to go off of, but it looks like its aimed at java-on-the-client (think applets, or fat clients), rather than webapps. Christian---------------------------------------------- Christian Cryder [[email protected]] Internet Architect, ATMReports.com Barracuda - http://barracuda.enhydra.org ---------------------------------------------- "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Weinman, Greg Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:52 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Barracuda: Barracuda vs. JTC? As I understand the framework it is focused on swing clients relatively small in size. Quoted from IBM's developer works Java library: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-tcf1/ "TCF applications are characterized by having application business logic split between the client and the server. Generally, in TCF applications, message sizes are small and efficient, resulting in good interactivity without the need for high-speed links. TCF apps also are known for loose coupling between the client and the server, allowing each side to be developed separately. The split functionality of TCF's design is most practical for highly distributed applications." Cheers all, Greg -----Original Message----- From: Barr Bill P [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:09 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Barracuda: Barracuda vs. JTC? I just received a note about IBM's new Thin Client Framework. I have yet to read the articles, but it would be interesting to do an academic comparison with Barracuda. More info at: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/aw.nsf/FAQs/tcf