RE: is the cvs source actually current? worried!

The thing is, it isn't a matter of it being just one version off.  For 
instance.

DefaultApplicationAssembler:
version on barracudamvc.org = 1.8
                   version on b.e.org = 1.12
                                difference = 4 versions with 1.12 dating 
back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago

ObjectRepositoryAssembler:
version on barracudamvc.org = 1.2
                   version on b.e.org = 1.5
                                difference = 3 versions with 1.5 dating 
back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago

It is pretty obvious that 6 weeks and 1 day ago fell well before the time 
of the CVS commit freeze at b.e.org.  So, yes, we should ask Shawn about 
what he thinks might have happened but, in the mean time, should we be 
freezing commits barracudamvc.org or should we actively try to remedy 
things?  If anyone has a nice tool for diffing directories, it would be 
helpful to compare the "src" directory from barracudamvc.org to that of 
b.e.org.  That would be the most important thing to check.  Docs and such 
might also be a concern, but probably less so.

Jake


At 08:18 PM 1/19/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Jake,
>
>Ok...this is really wierd...to the best of my knowledge, what's on bmvc.org
>should be the most current source; I will check with Shawn, but he won't be
>back until Tuesday morning. I know we pulled the source and then froze the
>b.e.org tree, so unless stuff got checked in after the freeze, it should
>already be there on bmvc.org...
>
>I will ask Shawn first thing Tesuday morning and get an answer. Is there
>anything else which seems to be missing?
>
>Christian
>
>----------------------------------------------
>Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
>Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
>Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org
>----------------------------------------------
>"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
> > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:39 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually current? worried!
> >
> >
> >
> > After I made my changes to allow the "catalina-deploy" task to work, I
> > noticed problems with the DefaultApplicationAssembler.  It was using
> > absolute file paths to try to load the resources.  I thought,
> > that's weird,
> > I fixed that a while back on the b.e.org server.   So, I compared the
> > latest version from b.e.org to barracudaMVC.org and was a bit shocked to
> > find out that the version there is utterly different from the
> > latest one on
> > b.e.org.  It includes none of my changes which, once and for all, fixed
> > problems serving Barracuda directly out of a .war file.
> >
> > What is going on here?  Why is the CVS source different?  Wasn't
> > the latest
> > source imported from b.e.org?  I'm going to go through and see if a few
> > other changes I made are still there or not.  How many files might this
> > have happened to?  In the meantime, I'm updating
> > DefaultApplicationAssember
> > to the version from b.e.org, because that is the correct one
> > which actually
> > works properly.
> >
> > Jake
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Barracuda mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
>
>_______________________________________________
>Barracuda mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda