RE: Additional change to DefaultViewHandler proposal. ..

Kirk Daries <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Jake,
 
+1 from me.
 
Although... I'd still like Barracuda to support multiple presentation
technologies.
It's easier to sell Barracuda if it supports JSP, XSLT, ~append relevant
technology here~, etc etc
Alot of developers I've spoken to won't touch Barracuda because they
consider XMLC to be a third party technology/tool
that can disappear and leave them stranded.
 
I for one, would like to see that dream (multiple presentation technologies)
come to fruition....to ease all those doubts...
Then Barracuda would truly be marketable.
 
I've tried in the past to convince various developers of the following:
The brilliant event model. Event bubbling, etc
I've gone on and on about code seperation...
Why one shouldn't 'code' within your JSP pages.
etc
etc
 
At the end of the day. 
The biggest problem I have is trying to get them to bite on XMLC.
Until XMLC becomes more 'mainstream'...we definately need to provide for
alternatives.
 
Regards
KD
 
Ps.
Dont' get me wrong. I love XMLC. It's just selling it to other ppl that's so
hard.
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 06 March 2003 09:09
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Barracuda] Additional change to DefaultViewHandler proposal...



Hi everyone,

I was wondering about whether we might want to add some functionality to
DefaultViewHandler as long as we are modifying things there.   What I would
like to see is a way to set OutputOptions and for the code in
handleViewEvent() to pick that up when using the DOMWriter to write out the
response.

Currently, there is....
public DOMWriter getDOMWriter()

I propose adding...
public OutputOptions getOutputOptions()

Then, the code in handleViewEvent() which does this...
this.getDOMWriter().write(doc, vec.getResponse());

would, instead, do this...
this.getDOMWriter().write(doc, vec.getResponse(), this.getOutputOptions());


This allows us to avoid overriding handleViewEvent(), which has a number of
intricacies, simply to add custom OutputOptions.

This would be immensely helpful in the context of Diez' Pages model and
other areas, I'm sure.   It shouldn't cause any grief because no ones app
would break with this change since it only adds a new method which is really
only used internally by the implemented handleViewEvent().  And it doesn't
take away anything.


Any objections to something like this?  One might argue that this creates a
dependency upon XMLC.  Barracuda is supposed to allow the use of any DOM
tree, not just XMLC.  However, in practice, I don't know if anyone out there
uses Barracuda without using XMLC.  Plus, I think there actually are a few
places in the code that already create dependencies on XMLC.  So, I'm not
sure this is a big problem.  Thoughts?

Jake


At 02:58 PM 3/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:


Can people do a quick check on their Barracuda related code for me...I'd
like you to search for 'preCompRender' and 'postCompRender'.

Right now the signatures look like this:

    public void preCompRender(BComponent root, ViewContext vc) {
    public void postCompRender(BComponent root, ViewContext vc) {

I'd like to change it to be

    public void preCompRender(BComponent root) {
    public void postCompRender(BComponent root) {

This would require everyone to do a search and replace on the code above (if
they have it implemented...I'm guessing most people don't). Then, if those
methods were using a reference to ViewContext vc, you'd have to call the
(soon to be added) getViewContext() method.

Would this be a hardship for anyone?

Let me know as soon as possible...

Thanks,
Christian

----------------------------------------------
Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org <http://barracudamvc.org/> 
----------------------------------------------
"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"

_______________________________________________
Barracuda mailing list
[email protected]
http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
<http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.