RE: Barracuda Performance Questions

"Christian Cryder" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Xue,

> To be honest, I am not sure if I will work on this. It
> depends if it is worth to do.

Hey, I understand ;-) Only you are going to be able to make the decision
whether its easier to build on something existing (like Barracuda), or to
roll your own solution. Barracuda does have a fairly steep learning
curve, -but- its also incredibly flexible...you could plug in your own DOM
structure, plug in custom renderers, or as Jake said, you could even roll
your own components. Actually, you wouldn't even have to use the component
model at all if you didn't want to - the various Barracuda layers were
designed to be able to be used independently of one another, so if you
wanted to use the Event and Form models, and then use something else for
actually rendering responses back to the client, you could totally do that.
I don't think you'll find many other frameworks that are that flexible...

...but then again I am a bit biased too ;-)

At any rate, we'll be happy to help answer any questions you might have, so
feel free to holler.

Christian

(ps - I am trusting that you have downloaded a recent copy of the source
from cvs...that will make playing with the examples and benchmarking much
easier)
----------------------------------------------
Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org
----------------------------------------------
"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Xue-Feng Yang
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:13 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Barracuda] Barracuda Performance Questions
>
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> To be honest, I am not sure if I will work on this. It
> depends if it is worth to do. I will look at
> Barracuda's event model carefully before I make any
> decision.
>
> > So one possibility is to consider writing
> > a) a custom DOM Loader - to create a DOM from your
> > structure
> > b) a DOM Wrapper - to make your structure look/act
> > like a DOM
> >
> > If you were to do that then the Barracuda components
> > could work with your
> > "custom" DOM, which you could in turn use to
> > significantly reduce the number
> > of DOM nodes. I've thought of doing this very thing
> > for flat text documents,
> > thereby making it possible for Barracuda to
> > manipulate a text file or .rtf
> > format. The key is making the document in question
> > look like a DOM so that
> > Barracuda can work with it.
> >
>
> Assume that I will do something in Barracuda. I am
> sure that I will not go b). It makes too much
> unnecessary function calls between two data trees. It
> only can be a temporary solution. For a), a new dom
> implemetation has to be introduced in order to store
> squeezed data or deal with some text files as you
> mentioned. The dom operations should skip this part
> automatically. So it is unnecessary to use my data
> struture. From the current framework, I don't see
> anyway to use my data struture natually.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Xue-Feng
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> _______________________________________________
> Barracuda mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.