RE: Barracuda Performance Questions

Hi Jake, 

Thank you very much for the link. 

Xue-Feng

 --- Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> wrote: > At 04:13 PM
3/17/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >Assume that I will do something in Barracuda. I am
> >sure that I will not go b). It makes too much
> >unnecessary function calls between two data trees.
> It
> >only can be a temporary solution. For a), a new dom
> >implemetation has to be introduced in order to
> store
> >squeezed data or deal with some text files as you
> >mentioned. The dom operations should skip this part
> >automatically. So it is unnecessary to use my data
> >struture. From the current framework, I don't see
> >anyway to use my data struture natually.
> 
> 
> You could write up your own components to deal with
> the non-w3c dom data 
> structure.  Like Christian said, there are some
> default things in Barracuda 
> which are implemented so that the framework is
> immediately useful to 
> people.  However, there is no reason that
> alternative implementations of 
> component models couldn't be built.
> 
> BTW, have you taken a look at XOM?  I haven't read
> much about it, but it 
> was created (pretty recently) by the XML guru
> himself Elliotte Rusty 
> Harold.  Might be interesting to see if it solves
> some of the problems you 
> see with the w3c dom.  Maybe you can advise him of
> your "squeezing" 
> concepts....or maybe he's already implemented the
> same ideas?
> 
> http://www.cafeconleche.org/XOM/
> 
> There is a presentation on XOM here...
> http://www.cafeconleche.org/XOM/whatswrong/
> 
> 
> Jake  

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca