Re: Re: Enhydra: tomcat vs. enhydra
"David H. Young" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I really appreciate this conversation as I near my presentation in beautiful New Mexico... Talking in terms of framework seems to make the most sense. And I'd love to hear Madl vision for Enhydra as well. David David Li wrote: >>> Session Manager. Enhydra still has better session manager then Tomcat. >>> However, I think Tomcat supports a plug-in architecture for session and >>> it's possible to port Enhydra's session manager to Tomcat. >> >> >> Why do you think SessionManager is better the session management under >> Tomcat ? (are you talking about KeywordValue implementation ?) > > > The implementation includes write to disk and write to DB for fail-over. > Tomcat's session manager is basic. I am not talking about interface > difference but implementation difference. > >>> I think the Enhydra 6.0 is heading the direction of making Enhydra a >>> framework. >> >> >> I would like to see it! >> Right now i'm switching my SuperServlet web apps to 'standard' webapp >> that use XMLC at the presentation, but i can tell you is almost a pain >> in the ass. > > > Are you using XMLC 2.2? It's pretty straight forward to use XMLC 2.2 > with Tomcat. In fact, Tomcat is used as the development environment of > XMLC 2.2. ;) There is an example in 2.2 distribution. > > More XMLC 2.2 promotion here: > > http://debian-sf.objectweb.org/projects/xmlc > >> Previously i was used to run superservlet within standard >> Servlet container (outside Enhydra app server) and that was not >> strightforward... i can tell you. (Just as a not i've had to do that for >> maintenance reason and after all for performance reasons) > > > I thought the 5.0 has made that easy. There was a patch needed for 3.x > which I have posted here. I think that's integrated into 5.x already. > >> I really like Enydra... but Enhyra as a framework not as AppServer. >> >> How are the plan for the Enhydra future ? > > > According to Madl Alfred, that's the direction of Enhydra 6.0. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Enhydra mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/enhydra >