Re: Re: Enhydra: Re: Enhydra: tomcat vs. enhydra

>> Are you using XMLC 2.2? It's pretty straight forward to use XMLC 2.2
>> with Tomcat. In fact, Tomcat is used as the development environment of
>> XMLC 2.2. ;) There is an example in 2.2 distribution.
>
> No, i'm stuck with the xmlc that comes with enhydra (now 5.1beta7), 
> i've
> looked at 2.2alpha4 but never tried it in a production stage probably
> cause i was scared by the 'alpha' stage.
> As i can read the only thing changed is the xerces now packaged
> differently... right ?

I definitely need to drop the Alpha at some point and release the beta 
soon. People are scared of the "alpha" tag. :)

We have been using 2.2 in production for three months now. It's very 
stable.

>> More XMLC 2.2 promotion here:
>>
>> http://debian-sf.objectweb.org/projects/xmlc
>
> Definitely i'll look at it more deeper... I think there's no problem
> replacing xmlc jars within 5.1beta7 with the ones from xmlc2.2alpha4, 
> am
> i wrong ? Are you aware of problems with this configuration ?

I haven't try it. There are name space rearrangement for the Xerces. I 
have been trying to find time to test Enhydra in CVS and XMLC 2.2. Will 
let you know when I get around to do it.

David