Re: Ksync: Current status of KSync? It seems pretty inactive

The last message in the archives may very well be from me.  I was trying 
to use KSync at that point in time.  I've got some documentation that I 
added to KSync around that time.  I don't think Oleg ever actually 
incorporated it into the main KSync distribution though.  KSync 1.0 is 
very difficult to understand, my documentation helped to make it 
somewhat clearer.  I can send in what I have if someone wants to receive it.

I'd be willing to spend some time bringing KSync back to life.  Anyone else?

Alex.

Alexandr Koloskov wrote:

>Guys.
>
>Let me as one of the co-authors of kSync to bring some light at the
>situation. We were released kSync 1.0 almost a year ago and we had a
>great plans for this software. However, due to lack of community support
>and overall company interest shift to BREW platform this project was
>conservated. Also we have built kSync v.2.0 which was built on entirely
>different code base, so it has nothing common in terms of source code w/
>kSync 1.0, but it was built for our internal purposes and we don't want
>to release it as open-source. 
>
>So, entire picture is a bit sad. However, if community has an interest
>to this project, I'm and Oleg (main author of kSync) are available for
>answers and probably we can help with some issues or even with evolution
>of this software. We just can't do it alone.
>
>--
>Alexandr Koloskov
>Director of Development, Reaxion Corp.
> 
>E-Mail:  [email protected]
>WWW: www.reaxion.com 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>Of Brent Hale
>Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:35 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Ksync: Current status of KSync? It seems pretty inactive
>
>Hi,
>
>Is anyone out there?
>
>The last message I see in the archives is June 3, 2002.  I've read about
>a
>version 2.0 being available, but surprised that I can't find it on the
>site.
>
>I'm in the evaluation stage and am looking at this and Sync4J.  KSync
>appears to have released one, but the inactivity leads me to believe
>that
>KSync doesn't work well.  Any comments would be helpful.
>
>Brent Hale
>Eventronix Inc
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ksync mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://support.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ksync
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ksync mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://support.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ksync
>
>  
>