Re: [PATCH] WV enconding updates
Stefan Haustein <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:12:04 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.kxml |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Dortmund |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bogdan, thanks a lot. The new vesion is in CVS now. The main difference was that I had added a static method createParser registering all the tables.... Best, Stefan Bogdan Onoiu wrote: > Hi Stefan, > It's fine with me. PSA Put the correct package name. > > Bogdan > ================ > http://www.yamigo.com > Yamigo - It's a Wireless Village > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Stefan Haustein [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: 10 February 2004 22:43 >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: Kxml: [PATCH] WV enconding updates >> >>Ho Bogdan, >> >>I am sorry for the delay. I tried to apply the patch, but it seemed to >>fail (see below). Are you sure you have used the latest version from > > cvs > >>to create the patch: >> >>http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/kxml/kxml2/src/org/kxml2/wap/wv/ >> >>Perhaps its simpler if you to send the whole updated file? >> >>Best, >>Stefan >> >>haustein@linux:~/eclipse/kxml2/src/org/kxml2/wap/wv> patch -b WV.java >>patch >>patching file WV.java >>Hunk #1 FAILED at 280. >>Hunk #2 FAILED at 352. >>Hunk #3 FAILED at 369. >>Hunk #4 FAILED at 406. >>Hunk #5 FAILED at 577. >>5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file WV.java.rej >>Bogdan Onoiu wrote: >> >> >>>Hi, >>>They are the same, but I used the wrong email account. First mail > > went > >>>for approval to the moderator ;) >>> >>> >>>================ >>>http://www.yamigo.com >>>It's a Wireless Village >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf > >>>Of Stefan Haustein >>>Sent: 27 January 2004 11:48 >>>To: [email protected] >>>Subject: Re: Kxml: [PATCH] WV enconding updates >>> >>>Bogdan Onoiu wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Some fixes to the WV.java file, >>> >>> >>> >>>Thanks! >>> >>>Do I need to apply both patches, or just the ones from the second > > mail?