Re: WfProcess.get_activities_in_state( String) does not seem to work any more? issue in Shark.conf? or StandardSecurityManager?

Yes, that was it, thank you again!
Geeta




"Sasa Bojanic" <[email protected]> 
06/22/2005 10:33 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
<[email protected]>
cc

Subject
Re: [shark] WfProcess.get_activities_in_state( String) does not seem to 
work any more? issue in Shark.conf? or StandardSecurityManager?






Hi,
 
this is bug in Shark1.1. You can patch by eding else block at the end of 
WfActivitiyIteratorWrapper.fillObjectList() method:
 
    .....
         } else {
            activities.addAll(l);
         }
         setObjectList(activities);
........
 
 
Regards,
Sasa.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:28 AM
Subject: [shark] WfProcess.get_activities_in_state( String) does not seem 
to work any more? issue in Shark.conf? or StandardSecurityManager?


Hi all: 

I have been trying to get my application which was working fine on Shark 
1.0 to now work with Shark 1.1 and have mostly succeeded except for this 
one snag: The call: 

WfProcess.get_activities_in_state( String) 

does not seem to work any more. 

I dug around in the source and I thought it was because of this: 

Shark.conf should have "StandardSecurityManager.SECURITY_MODE" not "
SecurityManagerClassName.SECURITY_MODE" as it currently has. This is 
because of this code in 
StandardSecurityManager.check_process_get_activities_in_state has code to 
test this: 

     if (SECURITY_MODE==SECURITY_MODE_NUM_ADMIN_SECURITY) {..etc. 

But if you look at where SECURITY_MODE is being set (in 
StandardSecurityManager.configure(CallbackUtilities)), here's the code: 
String 
sec_m=cus.getProperty("StandardSecurityManager.SECURITY_MODE","NORMAL_SECURITY"); 


But Shark.conf has instead SecurityManagerClassName.SECURITY_MODE. I 
thought it must be a typo. But changing that in my Shark.conf didn't 
return me a nice list like I expected because the implementation of 
StandardSecuirtyManager.check_process_get_activities_in_state is 
essentially empty..! 

Is this deliberate? Please share any thoughts. Also let me know if I am 
way off-base.. 
Thanks in advance! 
Geeta 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This email is intended solely for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or 
protected health information.  Any duplication, dissemination, action 
taken in reliance upon, or other use of this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may violate 
applicable laws.  If this email has been received in error, please notify 
the sender and delete the information from your system.  The views 
expressed in this email are those of the sender and may not necessarily 
represent the views of IntelliCare.