Re: Is it necessary the process id in order to get an activity?

Hi,

WfMC spec say that activity Id is unique within the scope of it's process, and this interface is defined by WfMC.
In shark implementation, we always generate activity Id that is unique for the overall system, and this Id is consisted of process
Id, but this is just our implementation.

We could obtain an activity through its Id, but we want to conform to WfMC spec at this point. There is also another reason why we
need processId, and this is related to synchronization.

Regards,
Sasa.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaime Fernández" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:07 PM
Subject: [shark] Is it necessary the process id in order to get an activity?


The ExecutionAdministration interface defines the following method:
WfActivity getActivity(java.lang.String procId, java.lang.String actId)

Why do I need the procId in order to get the activity?. In fact, I
think that the actId includes the procId.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
>

--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws