AW: shark licence
"Madl Alfred - Together AT" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.shark |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi ! Just to clarify: Shark itself is a library (with optional wrapper services) licensed under LGPL. The Admin GUI is an application which uses parts of JaWE an JGraph and is licensed under GPL. Since I think nobody will have to link to / call parts of the Admin GUI the GPL license of this part should not "harm" your Shark LGPL usage in applications. One of the next releases of JaWE will use a LGPL version of JGraph so even this license and the license of the Admin GUI will change to LGPL in the future. Hope this helps. Greetings. Alfred Madl -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: delbd [mailto:[email protected]] Bereitgestellt: Dienstag, 02. August 2005 10:45 Bereitgestellt in: Shark Unterhaltung: [shark] shark licence Betreff: [shark] shark licence Hello, Shark licence is quite strange, i need some clarifications about it. This is declared on objetweb as in LGPL licence. However, it includes and links to jars from the jawe project, but the jawe project is under GPL licence, which means code using the jawe classes must be put under a GPL compatible licence (this is well known as the contamination behaviour of GPL licence) LGPL is not a GPL compatible licence (because LGPL does not force code source distribution of programs linking to the LGPL code). We need clarification on licence here, as we can use a LGPL licenced workflow engine, but we can't afford a GPL licenced one. Thanks for informations. -- David Delbecq Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium - Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.1 KB) - not displayed
message-footer.txt
(text/plain, 271 B)
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws