Re: performance issues
"Ramy Khalil" <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:09:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.shark |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1166616617-5041-109 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16079_7043554.1166616571457" ------=_Part_16079_7043554.1166616571457 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi yes i switched off the Security API and the time stamps i sent is with Security API swithched off. also i want to ask when their will be Shark2.0 release not beta because i can't use a beta versions. Also i need to know is their any differences in Shark2.0-beta7 from code handling perspective. At last i need to know how to handle enumeration attribute type from a code perspective. and thanks for your cooperation Greetings, Ramy. On 12/20/06, Sasa Bojanic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > did you try to switch-off Security API? It should also improve the > performance with shark1.1. > > Just for your information, the Shark2.0-beta7 version is coming with > SwingAdmin application + WEB Admin application + some other useful > client utilities... > > Greetings, > Sasa. > > Ramy Khalil wrote: > > Dear Sasa Bojanic > > First i would like to thank u for your fast response. > > i am using shark 1.1 as you assumed because simply i can't use a beta > > version (company policy). > > i changed my code to use SharkTransaction and it really improved the > > performance.i cerated 25 assignments and i got that result: > > Assignment no 0 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 1 lasted: 78ms > > Assignment no 2 lasted: 110ms > > Assignment no 3 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 4 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 5 lasted: 63ms > > Assignment no 6 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 7 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 8 lasted: 93ms > > Assignment no 9 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 10 lasted: 79ms > > Assignment no 11 lasted: 78ms > > Assignment no 12 lasted: 125ms > > Assignment no 13 lasted: 110ms > > Assignment no 14 lasted: 78ms > > Assignment no 15 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 16 lasted: 110ms > > Assignment no 17 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 18 lasted: 78ms > > Assignment no 19 lasted: 78ms > > Assignment no 20 lasted: 94ms > > Assignment no 21 lasted: 63ms > > Assignment no 22 lasted: 110ms > > Assignment no 23 lasted: 266ms > > Assignment no 24 lasted: 172ms > > time taken: 2537 for total > > with shark1.1 > > > > which is an improvement but still not the desired performance. > > > > i know that you will say use Shark 2.0.7 beta but as i said i can't use > a > > beta version according to my company policy also i downloaded shark > > 2.0.5beta but i does not have the swing admin interface and the batch > > file ( > > runsa.bat). > > > > On 12/20/06, Sasa Bojanic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> as I said, these are the tests with the latest 2.0-beta7 shark version > >> > >> Sasa. > >> > >> Thomas Buffagni wrote: > >> > Hi Sasa Bojanic, > >> > I'm curious to know what is the execution time of the same code below > >> with the > >> > latest version of shark...Does anybody have made some tests ? - > >> Thomas. > >> > > >> > Sasa Bojanic ha scritto: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > I made some tests on Shark2.0-beta7 using MySQL database. > >> > > > >> > > Here is the code snippet: > >> > > > >> > > long t1, t2, t3; > >> > > t1 = System.currentTimeMillis(); > >> > > > >> > > ut.begin(); > >> > > WfAssignment[] ass = sc.getResourceObject > >> ().get_sequence_work_item(0); > >> > > ut.commit(); > >> > > > >> > > t2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); > >> > > > >> > > for (int i = 0; i < ass.length; i++) { > >> > > long ti = System.currentTimeMillis(); > >> > > ut.begin(); > >> > > WfAssignment as = ass[i]; > >> > > WfActivity act = as.activity(); > >> > > act.key(); > >> > > act.name(); > >> > > WfProcess proc = act.container(); > >> > > proc.name(); > >> > > > >> > > am.getProcessDefinitionInfoByUniqueProcessDefinitionName( > >> sc.getSessionHandle(), > >> > > > >> > > proc.manager() > >> > > >> > > >> .name()); > >> > > am.getProcessCreatedTime(sc.getSessionHandle(), proc.key > >> ()); > >> > > am.getActivityCreatedTime(sc.getSessionHandle(), > proc.key > >> (), > >> > > act.key()); > >> > > DeadlineInfo[] difo = > >> > > am.getDeadlineInfoForActivity(sc.getSessionHandle(), > >> > > > >> proc.key(), > >> > > > >> act.key > >> ()); > >> > > ut.commit(); > >> > > long te = System.currentTimeMillis(); > >> > > > >> > > System.out.println("Assignment no. " > >> > > + (i + 1) + ": act=" + act.key() + ", > >> exec lasted " > >> > > + (te - ti) + " ms"); > >> > > > >> > > } > >> > > t3 = System.currentTimeMillis(); > >> > > > >> > > System.out.println("Overal exec lasted " > >> > > + (t3 - t1) + " ms, midTime=" + (t2 - > >> t1) + > >> " ms, > >> > > avgTime=" > >> > > + (t3 - t2) / ass.length + " ms"); > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > And here is the output: > >> > > > >> > > Assignment no. 1: > >> act=269_24_deadline_examples_do_something_do_something2, > >> > > exec lasted 31 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 2: > >> act=21_16_workflow_patterns_WfSP2_Implicit_Termination_A, > >> > > exec lasted 16 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 3: > >> act=261_8_workflow_patterns_WfBCP4_Exclusive_Choice_B, exec > >> > > lasted 31 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 4: > >> act=8_7_workflow_patterns_WfBCP3_Synchronization_A, > >> exec > >> > > lasted 31 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 5: > >> > > act=22_17_workflow_patterns_WfPIMI1_MI_without_synchronization_A, > >> exec > >> lasted > >> > > 16 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 6: > >> > > > >> > act=263_21_deadline_examples_several_async_and_one_sync_deadline_see_log, > >> > >> exec > >> > > lasted 31 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 7: act=271_2_test_js_manufacturing_produce_part2, > >> exec > >> lasted > >> > > 32 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 8: act=1_1_test_js_basic_A1, exec lasted 31 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 9: > >> act=16_13_workflow_patterns_WfABSP4_Discriminator_A, > >> exec > >> > > lasted 15 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 10: > >> > > > >> > act=25_20_deadline_examples_simple_async_and_sync_deadline_do_something, > >> exec > >> > > lasted 47 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 11: > act=31_25_test_js_mail_handling_enter_parameters, > >> exec > >> > > lasted 32 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 12: > >> act=20_15_workflow_patterns_WfSP1_Arbitrary_Cycles_A, exec > >> > > lasted 15 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 13: > >> act=11_10_workflow_patterns_WfABSP1_Multiple_Choice_A, exec > >> > > lasted 16 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 14: act=6_5_workflow_patterns_WfBCP1_Sequence_A, > exec > >> lasted 31 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 15: > >> > > act=28_22_deadline_examples_block_sync_deadline_do_something1, exec > >> lasted 16 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 16: act=270_2_test_js_manufacturing_produce_part1, > >> exec > >> lasted > >> > > 15 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 17: > >> act=7_6_workflow_patterns_WfBCP2_Parallel_Split_A, > >> exec > >> > > lasted 47 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 18: act=5_4_test_js_publish_doc_submit_document, > exec > >> lasted 16 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 19: act=3_3_test_js_specrelease_specification, exec > >> lasted 47 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 20: > >> act=12_11_workflow_patterns_WfABSP2_Synchronizing_Merge_A, > >> > > exec lasted 15 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 21: > >> > > > >> > act=23_18_workflow_patterns_WfPIMI2_MI_with_a_priori_known_design_time_knowledge_A, > >> > >> > > exec lasted 16 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 22: > >> act=19_14_workflow_patterns_WfABSP5_N_out_of_M_Join_A, exec > >> > > lasted 31 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 23: > act=10_9_workflow_patterns_WfBCP5_Simple_Merge_A, > >> exec > >> > > lasted 16 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 24: > >> act=13_12_workflow_patterns_WfABSP3_Multiple_Merge_A, exec > >> > > lasted 31 ms > >> > > Assignment no. 25: > >> > > act=24_19_deadline_examples_simple_sync_deadline_do_something, exec > >> lasted 31 ms > >> > > Overal exec lasted 703 ms, midTime=47 ms, avgTime=26 ms > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > As you can see, the average time for getting requested > >> information is > >> 26ms per > >> > > assignment which I think is good enough. > >> > > > >> > > I assume you are using Shark1.1 version? If so, it can greatly > >> improve > >> > > performance if you turn-off Security API (by commenting > appropriate > >> line in > >> > > Shark.conf). > >> > > The greatest improvement would be if you would do your queries > using > >> single > >> > > SharkTransaction (in your example there are more than 10 > >> transactions > >> > > implicitly created). In Shark1.1 it would be something like: > >> > > > >> > > SharkTransaction st=null; > >> > > try { > >> > > st=Shark.getInstance().createTransaction(); > >> > > WfActivity activity = assignment.activity(st); > >> > > activity.key(st); > >> > > activity.name(st); > >> > > WfProcess process = activity.container(st); > >> > > process.name(st); > >> > > adminMisc.getProcessMgrPkgId(st,process.manager(st).name(st)); > >> > > adminMisc.getProcessCreatedTime(st,process.key(st)); > >> > > adminMisc.getActivityCreatedTime(st,process.key(st),activity.key > >> (st)); > >> > > DeadlineInfo[] deadlineInfos = > >> > > deadlineAdministration.getDeadlineInfo(st,process.key(st), > >> activity.key(st)); > >> > > > >> > > } catch (Exception ex) { > >> > > Shark.getInstance().emptyCaches(); > >> > > } finally { > >> > > try { > >> > > st.release(); > >> > > } catch (Exception ex) {} > >> > > try { > >> > > Shark.getInstance().unlockProcesses(st); > >> > > } catch (Exception ex) {} > >> > > } > >> > > > >> > > Greetings, > >> > > Sasa. > >> > > > >> > > [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> I am facing the problem of very slow response from shark when > >> getting > >> > >> information about process and activities. > >> > >> > >> > >> my code is: > >> > >> > >> > >> WfAssignment > >> > >> > >> assignment=connection.getResourceObject().get_sequence_work_item(0); > >> > >> > >> > >> WfActivity activity = assignment.activity(); > >> > >> activity.key()); > >> > >> activity.name()); > >> > >> WfProcess process = activity.container(); > >> > >> process.name()); > >> > >> adminMisc.getProcessMgrPkgId(process.manager().name())); > >> > >> adminMisc.getProcessCreatedTime(process.key()))); > >> > >> adminMisc.getActivityCreatedTime(process.key(),activity.key()))); > >> > >> DeadlineInfo[] deadlineInfos = > >> > >> deadlineAdministration.getDeadlineInfo(process.key(), activity.key > >> ()); > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> this part of code takes about 545 Milli seconds each time i call > >> that > >> code. > >> > >> in fact i need to call that code for each activity assigned to a > >> user, so for > >> > >> example if the user have 20 activities approximately the time > taken > >> in > >> > >> getting those information is about 10 seconds for each user > >> which is > >> not > >> > >> acceptable at all so am asking if their is a way to enhance the > >> performance > >> > >> of that code or any sort of shark configuration available to > >> enhance > >> the > >> > >> shark performance. > >> > >> > >> > >> regards Ramy > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> You receive this message as a subscriber of the > >> [email protected] > >> > >> list. > >> > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > >> > >> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help > >> > >> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: > >> http://www.objectweb.org/wws > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > You receive this message as a subscriber of the > >> [email protected] list. > >> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > >> > > For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help > >> > > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: > >> http://www.objectweb.org/wws > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You receive this message as a subscriber of the > >> [email protected] list. > >> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > >> > For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help > >> > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: > >> http://www.objectweb.org/wws > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> You receive this message as a subscriber of the > >> [email protected] list. > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > >> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help > >> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws > >> > >> > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] list. > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > > For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help > > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws > > > > > > > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] list. > To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws > > > ------=_Part_16079_7043554.1166616571457 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi<br>yes i switched off the Security API and the time stamps i sent is with Security API swithched off.<br><br>also i want to ask when their will be Shark2.0 release not beta because i can't use a beta versions.<br><br> Also i need to know is their any differences in Shark2.0-beta7 from code handling perspective.<br><br>At last i need to know how to handle enumeration attribute type from a code perspective.<br><br>and thanks for your cooperation <br><br>Greetings,<br>Ramy.<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/20/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Sasa Bojanic</b> <<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi,<br><br>did you try to switch-off Security API? It should also improve the<br>performance with shark1.1.<br><br>Just for your information, the Shark2.0-beta7 version is coming with<br>SwingAdmin application + WEB Admin application + some other useful <br>client utilities...<br><br>Greetings,<br>Sasa.<br><br>Ramy Khalil wrote:<br>> Dear Sasa Bojanic<br>> First i would like to thank u for your fast response.<br>> i am using shark 1.1 as you assumed because simply i can't use a beta <br>> version (company policy).<br>> i changed my code to use SharkTransaction and it really improved the<br>> performance.i cerated 25 assignments and i got that result:<br>> Assignment no 0 lasted: 94ms<br>> Assignment no 1 lasted: 78ms <br>> Assignment no 2 lasted: 110ms<br>> Assignment no 3 lasted: 94ms<br>> Assignment no 4 lasted: 94ms<br>> Assignment no 5 lasted: 63ms<br>> Assignment no 6 lasted: 94ms<br>> Assignment no 7 lasted: 94ms <br>> Assignment no 8 lasted: 93ms<br>> Assignment no 9 lasted: 94ms<br>> Assignment no 10 lasted: 79ms<br>> Assignment no 11 lasted: 78ms<br>> Assignment no 12 lasted: 125ms<br>> Assignment no 13 lasted: 110ms <br>> Assignment no 14 lasted: 78ms<br>> Assignment no 15 lasted: 94ms<br>> Assignment no 16 lasted: 110ms<br>> Assignment no 17 lasted: 94ms<br>> Assignment no 18 lasted: 78ms<br>> Assignment no 19 lasted: 78ms <br>> Assignment no 20 lasted: 94ms<br>> Assignment no 21 lasted: 63ms<br>> Assignment no 22 lasted: 110ms<br>> Assignment no 23 lasted: 266ms<br>> Assignment no 24 lasted: 172ms<br>> time taken: 2537 for total <br>> with shark1.1<br>><br>> which is an improvement but still not the desired performance.<br>><br>> i know that you will say use Shark 2.0.7 beta but as i said i can't use a<br>> beta version according to my company policy also i downloaded shark <br>> 2.0.5beta but i does not have the swing admin interface and the batch<br>> file (<br>> runsa.bat).<br>><br>> On 12/20/06, Sasa Bojanic <<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> > wrote:<br>>><br>>> Hi,<br>>><br>>> as I said, these are the tests with the latest 2.0-beta7 shark version<br>>><br>>> Sasa.<br>>><br>>> Thomas Buffagni wrote:<br>>> > Hi Sasa Bojanic, <br>>> > I'm curious to know what is the execution time of the same code below<br>>> with the<br>>> > latest version of shark...Does anybody have made some tests ? -<br>>> Thomas.<br>>> > <br>>> > Sasa Bojanic ha scritto:<br>>> > > Hi,<br>>> > ><br>>> > > I made some tests on Shark2.0-beta7 using MySQL database.<br>>> > ><br>>> > > Here is the code snippet: <br>>> > ><br>>> > > long t1, t2, t3;<br>>> > > t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();<br>>> > ><br>>> > > ut.begin();<br>>> > > WfAssignment[] ass = sc.getResourceObject<br>>> ().get_sequence_work_item(0);<br>>> > > ut.commit();<br>>> > ><br>>> > > t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();<br>>> > ><br>>> > > for (int i = 0; i < ass.length; i++) {<br>>> > > long ti = System.currentTimeMillis();<br>>> > > ut.begin();<br>>> > > WfAssignment as = ass[i];<br>>> > > WfActivity act = as.activity();<br>>> > > act.key();<br>>> > > act.name();<br>>> > > WfProcess proc = act.container();<br>>> > > proc.name();<br>>> > > <br>>> > > am.getProcessDefinitionInfoByUniqueProcessDefinitionName(<br>>> sc.getSessionHandle(),<br>>> > ><br>>> > > proc.manager()<br>>> ><br>>> ><br>>> .name()); <br>>> > > am.getProcessCreatedTime(sc.getSessionHandle(), proc.key<br>>> ());<br>>> > > am.getActivityCreatedTime(sc.getSessionHandle(), proc.key<br>>> (),<br>>> > > act.key());<br>>> > > DeadlineInfo[] difo =<br>>> > > am.getDeadlineInfoForActivity(sc.getSessionHandle(),<br>>> > ><br>>> proc.key(),<br>>> > ><br>>> act.key<br>>> ());<br>>> > > ut.commit();<br>>> > > long te = System.currentTimeMillis();<br>>> > ><br>>> > > System.out.println("Assignment no. " <br>>> > > + (i + 1) + ": act=" + act.key() + ",<br>>> exec lasted "<br>>> > > + (te - ti) + " ms");<br> >> > ><br>>> > > }<br>>> > > t3 = System.currentTimeMillis();<br>>> > ><br>>> > > System.out.println("Overal exec lasted "<br>>> > > + (t3 - t1) + " ms, midTime=" + (t2 - <br>>> t1) +<br>>> " ms,<br>>> > > avgTime="<br>>> > > + (t3 - t2) / ass.length + " ms");<br>>> > ><br>>> > ><br>>> > > And here is the output: <br>>> > ><br>>> > > Assignment no. 1:<br>>> act=269_24_deadline_examples_do_something_do_something2,<br>>> > > exec lasted 31 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 2:<br>>> act=21_16_workflow_patterns_WfSP2_Implicit_Termination_A, <br>>> > > exec lasted 16 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 3:<br>>> act=261_8_workflow_patterns_WfBCP4_Exclusive_Choice_B, exec<br>>> > > lasted 31 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 4: <br>>> act=8_7_workflow_patterns_WfBCP3_Synchronization_A,<br>>> exec<br>>> > > lasted 31 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 5:<br>>> > > act=22_17_workflow_patterns_WfPIMI1_MI_without_synchronization_A, <br>>> exec<br>>> lasted<br>>> > > 16 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 6:<br>>> > ><br>>> act=263_21_deadline_examples_several_async_and_one_sync_deadline_see_log,<br>>> <br>>> exec<br>>> > > lasted 31 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 7: act=271_2_test_js_manufacturing_produce_part2,<br>>> exec<br>>> lasted<br>>> > > 32 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 8: act=1_1_test_js_basic_A1, exec lasted 31 ms <br>>> > > Assignment no. 9:<br>>> act=16_13_workflow_patterns_WfABSP4_Discriminator_A,<br>>> exec<br>>> > > lasted 15 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 10:<br>>> > ><br> >> act=25_20_deadline_examples_simple_async_and_sync_deadline_do_something,<br>>> exec<br>>> > > lasted 47 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 11: act=31_25_test_js_mail_handling_enter_parameters, <br>>> exec<br>>> > > lasted 32 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 12:<br>>> act=20_15_workflow_patterns_WfSP1_Arbitrary_Cycles_A, exec<br>>> > > lasted 15 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 13: <br>>> act=11_10_workflow_patterns_WfABSP1_Multiple_Choice_A, exec<br>>> > > lasted 16 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 14: act=6_5_workflow_patterns_WfBCP1_Sequence_A, exec<br>>> lasted 31 ms <br>>> > > Assignment no. 15:<br>>> > > act=28_22_deadline_examples_block_sync_deadline_do_something1, exec<br>>> lasted 16 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 16: act=270_2_test_js_manufacturing_produce_part1, <br>>> exec<br>>> lasted<br>>> > > 15 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 17:<br>>> act=7_6_workflow_patterns_WfBCP2_Parallel_Split_A,<br>>> exec<br>>> > > lasted 47 ms<br> >> > > Assignment no. 18: act=5_4_test_js_publish_doc_submit_document, exec<br>>> lasted 16 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 19: act=3_3_test_js_specrelease_specification, exec<br>>> lasted 47 ms <br>>> > > Assignment no. 20:<br>>> act=12_11_workflow_patterns_WfABSP2_Synchronizing_Merge_A,<br>>> > > exec lasted 15 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 21:<br>>> > ><br>>> act=23_18_workflow_patterns_WfPIMI2_MI_with_a_priori_known_design_time_knowledge_A, <br>>><br>>> > > exec lasted 16 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 22:<br>>> act=19_14_workflow_patterns_WfABSP5_N_out_of_M_Join_A, exec<br>>> > > lasted 31 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 23: act=10_9_workflow_patterns_WfBCP5_Simple_Merge_A, <br>>> exec<br>>> > > lasted 16 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 24:<br>>> act=13_12_workflow_patterns_WfABSP3_Multiple_Merge_A, exec<br>>> > > lasted 31 ms<br>>> > > Assignment no. 25: <br>>> > > act=24_19_deadline_examples_simple_sync_deadline_do_something, exec<br>>> lasted 31 ms<br>>> > > Overal exec lasted 703 ms, midTime=47 ms, avgTime=26 ms<br>>> > ><br>>> > > <br>>> > > As you can see, the average time for getting requested<br>>> information is<br>>> 26ms per<br>>> > > assignment which I think is good enough.<br>>> > ><br>>> > > I assume you are using Shark1.1 version? If so, it can greatly<br>>> improve<br>>> > > performance if you turn-off Security API (by commenting appropriate<br>>> line in<br>>> > > Shark.conf).<br>>> > > The greatest improvement would be if you would do your queries using <br>>> single<br>>> > > SharkTransaction (in your example there are more than 10<br>>> transactions<br>>> > > implicitly created). In Shark1.1 it would be something like:<br>>> > > <br>>> > > SharkTransaction st=null;<br>>> > > try {<br>>> > > st=Shark.getInstance().createTransaction();<br>>> > > WfActivity activity = assignment.activity(st);<br>>> > > activity.key(st);<br>>> > > activity.name(st);<br>>> > > WfProcess process = activity.container(st);<br>>> > > process.name(st);<br>>> > > adminMisc.getProcessMgrPkgId(st, process.manager(st).name(st));<br>>> > > adminMisc.getProcessCreatedTime(st,process.key(st));<br>>> > > adminMisc.getActivityCreatedTime(st,process.key(st),activity.key<br>>> (st));<br>>> > > DeadlineInfo[] deadlineInfos = <br>>> > > deadlineAdministration.getDeadlineInfo(st,process.key(st),<br>>> activity.key(st));<br>>> > ><br>>> > > } catch (Exception ex) {<br>>> > > Shark.getInstance ().emptyCaches();<br>>> > > } finally {<br>>> > > try {<br>>> > > st.release();<br>>> > > } catch (Exception ex) {}<br>>> > > try {<br>>> > > Shark.getInstance().unlockProcesses(st);<br>>> > > } catch (Exception ex) {}<br>>> > > }<br>>> > ><br>>> > > Greetings,<br>>> > > Sasa.<br>>> > ><br> >> > > <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> wrote:<br>>> > >> I am facing the problem of very slow response from shark when<br>>> getting<br>>> > >> information about process and activities. <br>>> > >><br>>> > >> my code is:<br>>> > >><br>>> > >> WfAssignment<br>>> > >><br>>> assignment=connection.getResourceObject().get_sequence_work_item(0); <br>>> > >><br>>> > >> WfActivity activity = assignment.activity();<br>>> > >> activity.key());<br>>> > >> activity.name());<br>>> > >> WfProcess process = activity.container();<br>>> > >> process.name());<br>>> > >> adminMisc.getProcessMgrPkgId(process.manager().name()));<br>>> > >> adminMisc.getProcessCreatedTime(process.key()))); <br>>> > >> adminMisc.getActivityCreatedTime(process.key(),activity.key())));<br>>> > >> DeadlineInfo[] deadlineInfos =<br>>> > >> deadlineAdministration.getDeadlineInfo(process.key (), activity.key<br>>> ());<br>>> > >><br>>> > >><br>>> > >> this part of code takes about 545 Milli seconds each time i call<br>>> that<br>>> code.<br>>> > >> in fact i need to call that code for each activity assigned to a <br>>> user, so for<br>>> > >> example if the user have 20 activities approximately the time taken<br>>> in<br>>> > >> getting those information is about 10 seconds for each user<br> >> which is<br>>> not<br>>> > >> acceptable at all so am asking if their is a way to enhance the<br>>> performance<br>>> > >> of that code or any sort of shark configuration available to <br>>> enhance<br>>> the<br>>> > >> shark performance.<br>>> > >><br>>> > >> regards Ramy<br>>> > >><br>>> > >><br>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br>>> > >><br>>> > >><br>>> > >> --<br>>> > >> You receive this message as a subscriber of the<br>>> <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected] </a><br>>> > >> list.<br>>> > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>>> > >> For general help: mailto: <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>?subject=help<br>>> > >> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page:<br>>> <a href="http://www.objectweb.org/wws">http://www.objectweb.org/wws </a><br>>> > >><br>>> > ><br>>> > ><br>>> > ><br>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>>><br>>> > > <br>>> > ><br>>> > > --<br>>> > > You receive this message as a subscriber of the<br>>> <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> list.<br>>> > > To unsubscribe: mailto: <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>>> > > For general help: mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>?subject=help<br>>> > > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: <br>>> <a href="http://www.objectweb.org/wws">http://www.objectweb.org/wws</a><br>>> > ><br>>> ><br>>> ><br>>> ><br>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br>>> ><br>>> ><br>>> > --<br>>> > You receive this message as a subscriber of the<br>>> <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> list.<br>>> > To unsubscribe: mailto: <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>>> > For general help: mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>?subject=help<br>>> > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: <br>>> <a href="http://www.objectweb.org/wws">http://www.objectweb.org/wws</a><br>>> ><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> --<br>>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the <br>>> <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> list.<br>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>>> For general help: mailto: <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>?subject=help<br>>> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: <a href="http://www.objectweb.org/wws">http://www.objectweb.org/wws</a><br>>><br>>> <br>>><br>><br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>><br>> --<br>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the <a href="mailto:[email protected]"> [email protected]</a> mailing list.<br>> To unsubscribe: mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>> For general help: mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]"> [email protected]</a>?subject=help<br>> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: <a href="http://www.objectweb.org/wws">http://www.objectweb.org/wws</a><br>><br><br><br><br><br><br>--<br>You receive this message as a subscriber of the <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> mailing list.<br>To unsubscribe: mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>For general help: mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]"> [email protected]</a>?subject=help<br>ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: <a href="http://www.objectweb.org/wws">http://www.objectweb.org/wws</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br> ------=_Part_16079_7043554.1166616571457-- ------------=_1166616617-5041-109 Content-Type: text/plain; name="message-footer.txt" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="message-footer.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws ------------=_1166616617-5041-109--