Re: still too early for XHTML :-((

Richard Kunze <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.enhydra.xmlc
Organization Tivano Software GmbH
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 07 April 2003 18:20, [email protected] wrote:
> We've been using XHTML+XMLC for 9 months, and we too encountered that
> problem.  My solution, was to do it this way:
> <script src="x"><!-- IE Sucks --></script>
>
> every place we want to use a "self-terminating script tag".
>
> Having said that, I'm also curious as to what the document type you're
> sending down in your request headers.  Even though we produce XHTML, we're
> really telling it we are an html document.  It's quite possible that
> sending the correct "Content-type" header down will work.  Problem is, I
> don't know what the correct type REALLY is.

According to the W3C 
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-xhtml-media-types-20020801/), the most 
appropriate content type to send for XHTML is "application/xhtml+xml", 
although "application/xml" and "text/xml" are valid as well, and "text/html" 
can be used when the content is HTML compatible XHTML 1.0


-- 
Richard Kunze 

[ t]ivano Software, Bahnhofstr. 18, 63263 Neu-Isenburg
Tel.: +49 6102 80 99 07 - 0, Fax.: +49 6102 80 99 07 - 1
http://www.tivano.de, [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+kaqb86Aqb3OZfF4RAmIxAKCqsX+NGI3ZqkImx+qpZeq580M5uwCgz+dS
tBtoGsn3BFTPot5qte48Xrk=
=mECl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.