Re: Xmlc: still too early for XHTML :-((
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.general,gmane.comp.java.enhydra.xmlc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Po, 2003-04-07 at 18:20, [email protected] wrote: > We've been using XHTML+XMLC for 9 months, and we too encountered that > problem. My solution, was to do it this way: > <script src="x"><!-- IE Sucks --></script> Yes, I also got the same idea. It even works. But I don't believe it anymore - I wonder how many similar problems may appear later, closer to the deadline... > Having said that, I'm also curious as to what the document type you're > sending down in your request headers. Even though we produce XHTML, we're > really telling it we are an html document. Yeah, I am also sending "text/html". I tried other but then JavaScript didn't see DOM at all - I also posted about this back in January. I even submitted a patch to Enhydra maintainers so Enhydra 5.1 will produce proper (=compatible) document type. Petr