Re: still too early for XHTML :-((

At 10:28 PM 4/10/2003 +0200, you wrote:
>On Èt, 2003-04-10 at 22:05, Jacob Kjome wrote:
> > fathom why you'd bother putting an id attribute
>
>you must have missed the fact that it's not me who creates the HTML. The
>ID was already there and the HTML guy argued that XMLC is crappy when it
>can't compile a perfectly valid XHTML document.

Ok, fair enough.  It was someone else being redundant.

> > redundant and as bugs go, I'd put this one at the bottom of the list
> > to fix.
>
>The "fix" is to update the DTD to the latest revision (i.e. to update
>one file that was downloaded from w3.org and included in the XMLC
>without any change). Enhydra 5.1 already contains that. I mentioned it
>in the list of 6 items just to be complete (to list all issues I
>encountered).

Well, that makes sense.  If XMLC doesn't have the latest DTD, then it 
should have it.  BTW, how does one switch between DTDs?  Does XMLC read the 
source file's DTD and compile against that?  I assume that it uses the 
local version that matches the declared one in the template instead of 
downloading it.  What if the version being compiled against is 
XHTML1.1?  Those dtd's don't currently exist in the CVS source.  Only the 
1.0 dtd's exist.  Should they be added?

Jake

>Petr
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>XMLC mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xmlc