Re: going through old patches...are these still relevant?

A small update on this....

I've just committed patch #4 (with a few modifications) below.  Probably 
should look at patches 1 - 3 for XMLC-2.2 and the bug report that actually 
does have a patch workaround, but it is, apparently, not ideal and needs 
thought.

Any other stuff that should be on the TODO list for an XMLC-2.2 full release?

Jake

At 01:30 PM 5/21/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>I'm just looking back through the archives at some patches I found that 
>don't seem be included in XMLC.  I'd like to know if there was a reason or 
>if they were just lost in the shuffle...
>
>1.  Patch to provide support for isSupported()  - from James Graves
>http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01391.html
>
>2.  SSI Basedir option - from Diez B. Roggisch
>http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01393.html
>
>3.  patch for using getElementByID() on a WML and XHTML document DOM - 
>from James Graves
>http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01632.html
>
>4.  patch for supporting more dtds and new structure for storing dtd's 
>locally - from James Graves
>http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01641.html
>
>Richard actually seemed to accept this on in a follow-up message he sent, 
>but the patch was never applied.
>http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01696.html
>
>
>Not patches, but might want to look into these...
>
>1.  a test case pointing out a bug is provided.  Not sure if the bug has 
>been addressed yet.
>http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01749.html
>
>2.  diff between XMLC's xerces and the official Xerces-1.4.4 - from Denny 
>Chambers
>http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01768.html
>
>If we got Xerces2 to incorporate relevant patches, that would make moving 
>to Xerces2 much easier.
>
>
>
>I'm sure there is other stuff, but I wanted to get this recorded in one 
>spot so we can easily reference what might need to be done.
>
>Jake