Re: XMLC xerces jar

Sounds reasonable to me.  If there aren't objections from other XMLC 
developers today, then I'll make the change.  Is the name xmlcxml.jar 
acceptable to everyone?  Any other suggestions?

BTW, you should be including one or the other of xmlParserAPIs.jar and 
xml-apis.jar, not both.  They perform the same function.  I have been told 
on the xerces-j-user list that xml-apis.jar is the preferred jar name.  The 
xmlParserAPIs.jar is still generated only to satisfy people that have been 
using that jar name.  Seems to me like they should just pick one or the 
other to avoid confusion, but...  So, I'd suggest including xercesImpl.jar 
and xml-apis.jar from Xerces2 in Enhydra5.1.

Jake

At 12:18 PM 7/9/2003 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>  In Enhydra5.1 final we will include xmlc 2.2 and Xerces 2.4, and we will
>have
>  all necessary jars in Enhydra5.1\lib directory.
>  We don't want to use xmlc-all-runtime.jar because we need many separate
>  jar-files to be very modular. Problem is with xerces.jar which came with
>  XMLC 2.2.
>  We think that it will be a little confusing for developers to have this
>  names of jars:
>  xerces.jar (which is modified Xerces 1.4.4 sources produced by xmlc with
>  different packages)
>  XercesImp.jar, xmlParserApis.jar and xml-apis.jar from Xerces 2.
>
>  We renamed xerces.jar in xmlcxml.jar (suggestion by Alfred Madl), and our
>  question is: could you rename this jar file into something different than
>  xerces.jar, because we want to include XMLC 2.2 in Enhydra without any
>  changes.
>
>
>  Dragan Radakovic
>Together, Serbia
>
>_______________________________________________
>XMLC mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xmlc