Re: to </p> or not to </p>
David Corbin <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:57:30 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.xmlc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 22 September 2003 13:45, Jacob Kjome wrote: > Hi everyone, > > So, does anyone have a problem with modifying XMLC to force <p> tags to be > ended with </p>? Obviously, either form is legal HTML4.01, but ending <p> > tags with </p> seems like the more correct thing to do and matches up with > the the next wave of HTML which is XHTML. People really should get used to > this at this point, but I'm asking for opinions here because I don't want > to break everyone's layouts unnecessarily. I'm all for encouraging people (and XMLC) to move more toward XHTML. I've been using it for a year, and while there have been some problems, I think it's the right thing to do. However, I don't think the way to do that is to break what seems to work right now in HTML. -- David Corbin <[email protected]>