Re: XMLC vs. JAVA TEMPLATE METHOD

"David H. Young" <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:59:59 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.enhydra.xmlc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi John,

For a quick response, check out the article I wrote awhile back at:
http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=XMLCvsJSP

I've also got an old slide presentation (powerpoint) you can download at
http://www.kspar.net/xmlcIntro.ppt

BTW, I had to approve your posting since this is a monitored list.  Feel 
free to join the group at
http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/index.html

Regards,
David


John J. Westerkamp wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am considering using XMLC for a large J2EE project. I currenlty create
> HTML pages which are
> doctored to include the XSLT commands. From this perspective, I definitely
> see the advantage of a simple
> HTML page without page designers having to know XSLT. What I do not like,
> is seeing a bunch of new Java
> classes for every HTML page in my design. I currently use a template base
> class to do all of the XML document
> generation using Metadata to link the XML tags to variable names in a
> Java list object. I only have a single
> class that is used to generate all of the documents for every HTML page.
> Can I hear some arguments as to
> how I can do this with XMLC and why using XMLC would be a better approach?
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> John Westerkamp
> Productivity Network Innovations, LLC


-- 
David H. Young
SAMBA Holdings, Inc.
Chief Technology Officer
1730 MontaƱo NW
Albuquerque, NM 87107
505.797.2622 x113
http://www.samba.biz