Re: XMLC vs. JAVA TEMPLATE METHOD
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:59:59 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.xmlc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi John, For a quick response, check out the article I wrote awhile back at: http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=XMLCvsJSP I've also got an old slide presentation (powerpoint) you can download at http://www.kspar.net/xmlcIntro.ppt BTW, I had to approve your posting since this is a monitored list. Feel free to join the group at http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/index.html Regards, David John J. Westerkamp wrote: > Hi, > > I am considering using XMLC for a large J2EE project. I currenlty create > HTML pages which are > doctored to include the XSLT commands. From this perspective, I definitely > see the advantage of a simple > HTML page without page designers having to know XSLT. What I do not like, > is seeing a bunch of new Java > classes for every HTML page in my design. I currently use a template base > class to do all of the XML document > generation using Metadata to link the XML tags to variable names in a > Java list object. I only have a single > class that is used to generate all of the documents for every HTML page. > Can I hear some arguments as to > how I can do this with XMLC and why using XMLC would be a better approach? > > > Thanks! > > John Westerkamp > Productivity Network Innovations, LLC -- David H. Young SAMBA Holdings, Inc. Chief Technology Officer 1730 MontaƱo NW Albuquerque, NM 87107 505.797.2622 x113 http://www.samba.biz