Re: Memory And Threads

Alex Bagehot <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:47:07 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.grinder.user
Message-ID <CAHeneC9cwjp87M2zOiR45ReqFnih1s5vv_u_5K+jt5fhRSQhng@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

We probably need to cover some checks and get some more info:

What software versions grinder/java/etc is this?
Do you have the option of comparing the same on a Linux/other box?

What do you define as better performance?
How do you know it is not limited by the system under test?
What particular [work]load are you trying to achieve?

Answers to these questions may help progress it.

Thanks
Alex
On 31 Aug 2014 21:17, "Adil qureshi" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Greeting for the day.
>
>
> I am getting better performance with 25 threads than 30 threads and the
> performance of grinder keeps on decreasing if I increase the number of
> threads.
>
> The system from which I am running grinder is a Solaris server and has
> high CPU capability as well as RAM.
>
> If I start more than one process and divide the threads among them the no
> of calls that grinder can make even decreases.
>
> I am trying to achieve a particular load which has become impossible as of
> now  with threads so limited.
>
>
> Any suggestions on this will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks In Advance,
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> grinder-use mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/grinder-use
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/

_______________________________________________
grinder-use mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/grinder-use