Re: Memory And Threads
Alex Bagehot <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:47:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.grinder.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHeneC9cwjp87M2zOiR45ReqFnih1s5vv_u_5K+jt5fhRSQhng@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, We probably need to cover some checks and get some more info: What software versions grinder/java/etc is this? Do you have the option of comparing the same on a Linux/other box? What do you define as better performance? How do you know it is not limited by the system under test? What particular [work]load are you trying to achieve? Answers to these questions may help progress it. Thanks Alex On 31 Aug 2014 21:17, "Adil qureshi" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Greeting for the day. > > > I am getting better performance with 25 threads than 30 threads and the > performance of grinder keeps on decreasing if I increase the number of > threads. > > The system from which I am running grinder is a Solaris server and has > high CPU capability as well as RAM. > > If I start more than one process and divide the threads among them the no > of calls that grinder can make even decreases. > > I am trying to achieve a particular load which has become impossible as of > now with threads so limited. > > > Any suggestions on this will be highly appreciated. > > Thanks In Advance, > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Slashdot TV. > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. > http://tv.slashdot.org/ > _______________________________________________ > grinder-use mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/grinder-use > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ grinder-use mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/grinder-use